public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page()
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 22:42:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtczcE8bxNJfWwZ5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220521131700.3661-8-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>

On Sat, May 21, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> 
> Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() in
> mmu_free_root_page(), kvm_mmu_free_guest_mode_roots(), is_unsync_root()
> and is_tdp_mmu() because it can not return NULL.

s/can not/can no longer, to make it very clear the to_shadow_page() _could_ return
NULL in the past, but something changed.

And please explain _why_ it can no longer return NULL, even if that's just a
reference to kvm_mmu_alloc_local_shadow_page() or whatever it ends up being named.
That can also tie into the obsolete sp handling.

> Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() in
> is_page_fault_stale() and is_obsolete_root() because it can not return
> NULL and the obsoleting for local shadow page is already handled by
> a different way.
> 
> When the obsoleting process is done, all the obsoleted non-local shadow
> pages are already unlinked from the local shadow pages by the help of
> the parent rmap from the children and the local shadow pages become
> theoretically valid again.  The local shadow page can be freed if
> is_obsolete_sp() return true, or be reused if is_obsolete_sp() becomes
> false.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> ---

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21 13:16 [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Verify PDPTE for nested NPT in PAE paging mode when page fault Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 21:17   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add using_local_root_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:28   ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 21:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 22:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Reduce a check in using_local_root_page() for common cases Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add local shadow pages Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:38   ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 22:01   ` David Matlack
2022-07-20  0:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Link PAE root pagetable with its children Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Activate local shadow pages and remove old logic Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:42   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Allocate mmu->pae_root for PAE paging on-demand Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20  0:07     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Move the verifying of NPT's PDPTE in FNAME(fetch) Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove unused INVALID_PAE_ROOT and IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Don't use mmu->pae_root when shadowing PAE NPT in 64-bit host Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:26   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 23:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:17 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_alloc_special_roots() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26  8:49 ` [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 20:27   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtczcE8bxNJfWwZ5@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox