From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page()
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 22:42:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtczcE8bxNJfWwZ5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220521131700.3661-8-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 21, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
>
> Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() in
> mmu_free_root_page(), kvm_mmu_free_guest_mode_roots(), is_unsync_root()
> and is_tdp_mmu() because it can not return NULL.
s/can not/can no longer, to make it very clear the to_shadow_page() _could_ return
NULL in the past, but something changed.
And please explain _why_ it can no longer return NULL, even if that's just a
reference to kvm_mmu_alloc_local_shadow_page() or whatever it ends up being named.
That can also tie into the obsolete sp handling.
> Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() in
> is_page_fault_stale() and is_obsolete_root() because it can not return
> NULL and the obsoleting for local shadow page is already handled by
> a different way.
>
> When the obsoleting process is done, all the obsoleted non-local shadow
> pages are already unlinked from the local shadow pages by the help of
> the parent rmap from the children and the local shadow pages become
> theoretically valid again. The local shadow page can be freed if
> is_obsolete_sp() return true, or be reused if is_obsolete_sp() becomes
> false.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-21 13:16 [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Verify PDPTE for nested NPT in PAE paging mode when page fault Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 21:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add using_local_root_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:28 ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 21:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 22:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Reduce a check in using_local_root_page() for common cases Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Add local shadow pages Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 21:38 ` David Matlack
2022-05-26 22:01 ` David Matlack
2022-07-20 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Link PAE root pagetable with its children Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Activate local shadow pages and remove old logic Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the check of the return value of to_shadow_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 22:42 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Allocate mmu->pae_root for PAE paging on-demand Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 0:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Move the verifying of NPT's PDPTE in FNAME(fetch) Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove unused INVALID_PAE_ROOT and IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:16 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Don't use mmu->pae_root when shadowing PAE NPT in 64-bit host Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 23:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 23:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-21 13:17 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_alloc_special_roots() Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 8:49 ` [PATCH V3 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Use one-off local shadow page for special roots Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-26 20:27 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtczcE8bxNJfWwZ5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox