From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"Cooper, Andrew" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@ethz.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@intel.com>,
"Nuzman, Joseph" <joseph.nuzman@intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Gross, Jurgen" <jgross@suse.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call depth tracking mitigation
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:23:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ytp6ooFQMLr3/h6v@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtnsTs8XkPS4nXdi@google.com>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 05:16:14PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> That looks good to me. I updated my LLVM tree to generate this code
> for the checks:
>
> https://github.com/samitolvanen/llvm-project/commits/kcfi
Thanks!
The alignment thing you added:
// Emit int3 padding before the type information to maintain alignment.
// The X86::MOV32ri instruction we emit is 5 bytes long.
uint64_t Padding = offsetToAlignment(5, MF.getAlignment());
while (Padding--)
EmitAndCountInstruction(MCInstBuilder(X86::INT3));
Doesn't seem to quite do what we want though.
When I use -fpatchable-function-entry=16,16 we effectively get a 32 byte
prefix on every function:
0000000000000000 <__cfi___traceiter_sched_kthread_stop>:
0: cc int3
1: cc int3
2: cc int3
3: cc int3
4: cc int3
5: cc int3
6: cc int3
7: cc int3
8: cc int3
9: cc int3
a: cc int3
b: b8 26 b1 df 98 mov $0x98dfb126,%eax
10: 90 nop
11: 90 nop
12: 90 nop
13: 90 nop
14: 90 nop
15: 90 nop
16: 90 nop
17: 90 nop
18: 90 nop
19: 90 nop
1a: 90 nop
1b: 90 nop
1c: 90 nop
1d: 90 nop
1e: 90 nop
1f: 90 nop
And given the parameters, that's indeed the only option. However, given
I can scribble the type thing just fine when moving to FineIBT and the
whole Skylake depth tracking only needs 10 bytes, I figured I'd try:
-fpatchable-function-entry=11,11 instead. But that resulted in
unalignment:
0000000000000000 <__cfi___traceiter_sched_kthread_stop>:
0: cc int3
1: cc int3
2: cc int3
3: cc int3
4: cc int3
5: cc int3
6: cc int3
7: cc int3
8: cc int3
9: cc int3
a: cc int3
b: b8 26 b1 df 98 mov $0x98dfb126,%eax
10: 90 nop
11: 90 nop
12: 90 nop
13: 90 nop
14: 90 nop
15: 90 nop
16: 90 nop
17: 90 nop
18: 90 nop
19: 90 nop
1a: 90 nop
000000000000001b <__traceiter_sched_kthread_stop>:
However, if I change clang like so:
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
index 789597f8ef1a..6c94313a197d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
@@ -124,9 +124,15 @@ void X86AsmPrinter::emitKCFITypeId(const MachineFunction &MF,
OutStreamer->emitSymbolAttribute(FnSym, MCSA_ELF_TypeFunction);
OutStreamer->emitLabel(FnSym);
+ int64_t PrefixNops = 0;
+ (void)MF.getFunction()
+ .getFnAttribute("patchable-function-prefix")
+ .getValueAsString()
+ .getAsInteger(10, PrefixNops);
+
// Emit int3 padding before the type information to maintain alignment.
// The X86::MOV32ri instruction we emit is 5 bytes long.
- uint64_t Padding = offsetToAlignment(5, MF.getAlignment());
+ uint64_t Padding = offsetToAlignment(5+PrefixNops, MF.getAlignment());
while (Padding--)
EmitAndCountInstruction(MCInstBuilder(X86::INT3));
Then it becomes:
0000000000000000 <__cfi___traceiter_sched_kthread_stop>:
0: b8 26 b1 df 98 mov $0x98dfb126,%eax
5: 90 nop
6: 90 nop
7: 90 nop
8: 90 nop
9: 90 nop
a: 90 nop
b: 90 nop
c: 90 nop
d: 90 nop
e: 90 nop
f: 90 nop
0000000000000010 <__traceiter_sched_kthread_stop>:
and things are 'good' again, except for functions that don't get a kcfi
preamble, those are unaligned... I couldn't find where the
patchable-function-prefix nops are generated to fix this up :/
Also; could you perhaps add a switch to supress ENDBR for functions with
a kCFI preamble ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-22 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 142+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-16 23:17 [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call depth tracking mitigation Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 01/38] x86/paravirt: Ensure proper alignment Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 02/38] x86/cpu: Use native_wrmsrl() in load_percpu_segment() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 0:22 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-07-17 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-17 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 20:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 5:11 ` Juergen Gross
2022-07-18 6:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-18 10:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 17:52 ` [patch 0/3] x86/cpu: Sanitize switch_to_new_gdt() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 17:52 ` [patch 1/3] x86/cpu: Remove segment load from switch_to_new_gdt() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 17:52 ` [patch 2/3] x86/cpu: Get rid of redundant switch_to_new_gdt() invocations Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 17:52 ` [patch 3/3] x86/cpu: Re-enable stackprotector Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 03/38] x86/modules: Set VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS in module_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 04/38] x86/vdso: Ensure all kernel code is seen by objtool Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 05/38] btree: Initialize early when builtin Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 06/38] objtool: Allow GS relative relocs Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 07/38] objtool: Track init section Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 08/38] objtool: Add .call_sites section Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 09/38] objtool: Add .sym_sites section Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 10/38] objtool: Add --hacks=skylake Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 11/38] objtool: Allow STT_NOTYPE -> STT_FUNC+0 tail-calls Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 12/38] x86/entry: Make sync_regs() invocation a tail call Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 13/38] x86/modules: Make module_alloc() generally available Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 14/38] x86/Kconfig: Add CONFIG_CALL_THUNKS Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 15/38] x86/retbleed: Add X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 16/38] modules: Make struct module_layout unconditionally available Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 17/38] module: Add arch_data to module_layout Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 18/38] mm/vmalloc: Provide huge page mappings Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 19/38] x86/module: Provide __module_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 20/38] x86/alternatives: Provide text_poke_[copy|set]_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 21/38] x86/entry: Make some entry symbols global Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 22/38] x86/paravirt: Make struct paravirt_call_site unconditionally available Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 23/38] x86/callthunks: Add call patching for call depth tracking Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 24/38] module: Add layout for callthunks tracking Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 25/38] x86/modules: Add call thunk patching Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 26/38] x86/returnthunk: Allow different return thunks Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 27/38] x86/asm: Provide ALTERNATIVE_3 Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 28/38] x86/retbleed: Add SKL return thunk Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 29/38] x86/retpoline: Add SKL retthunk retpolines Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:17 ` [patch 30/38] x86/retbleed: Add SKL call thunk Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 31/38] x86/calldepth: Add ret/call counting for debug Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 32/38] static_call: Add call depth tracking support Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 33/38] kallsyms: Take callthunks into account Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 34/38] x86/orc: Make it callthunk aware Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 35/38] kprobes: Add callthunk blacklisting Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 36/38] x86/ftrace: Make it call depth tracking aware Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 21:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-19 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-19 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 37/38] x86/bpf: Emit call depth accounting if required Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-19 5:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-19 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-16 23:18 ` [patch 38/38] x86/retbleed: Add call depth tracking mitigation Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 9:45 ` [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: Call " David Laight
2022-07-17 15:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-17 17:56 ` David Laight
2022-07-17 19:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 19:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 20:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-18 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 23:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-18 21:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-18 22:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 22:47 ` Joao Moreira
2022-07-18 22:55 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-18 23:08 ` Joao Moreira
2022-07-18 23:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 23:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-19 0:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 0:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 0:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-19 1:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 17:19 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-20 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-21 8:21 ` David Laight
2022-07-21 10:56 ` David Laight
2022-07-21 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-21 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-21 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-21 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-21 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-21 20:22 ` Joao Moreira
2022-07-22 0:16 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-22 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-07-22 15:38 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-21 22:01 ` David Laight
2022-07-22 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-22 13:27 ` David Laight
2022-07-23 9:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-19 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 0:19 ` Joao Moreira
2022-07-19 17:21 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-19 17:58 ` Joao Moreira
2022-07-19 8:26 ` David Laight
2022-07-19 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 17:23 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-19 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 18:06 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-19 20:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-18 22:48 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-18 22:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-18 23:10 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-18 23:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 23:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-20 9:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-20 16:55 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-20 19:42 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-07-22 20:11 ` Tim Chen
2022-07-22 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 19:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-19 10:24 ` Virt " Andrew Cooper
2022-07-19 14:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-19 16:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-07-19 21:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-07-19 14:45 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-07-19 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-20 16:57 ` [patch 00/38] x86/retbleed: " Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-20 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-20 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-20 18:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-20 19:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 19:36 ` Kees Cook
2022-07-20 19:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ytp6ooFQMLr3/h6v@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joao.moreira@intel.com \
--cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
--cc=joseph.nuzman@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kwikner@ethz.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox