From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>,
David Manouchehri <david.manouchehri@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 10:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yu4rzf9XI6NzHwne@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805230158.39378-2-khuey@kylehuey.com>
* Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote:
> From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
>
> This tests PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE modifying PKRU directly and
> removing the PKRU bit from XSTATE_BV.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h | 12 +++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
> index b078ce9c6d2a..72c14cd3ddc7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ static inline int cpu_has_pkeys(void)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static inline int cpu_max_xsave_size(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long XSTATE_CPUID = 0xd;
> + unsigned int eax;
> + unsigned int ebx;
> + unsigned int ecx;
> + unsigned int edx;
> +
> + __cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> + return ecx;
> +}
> +
> static inline u32 pkey_bit_position(int pkey)
> {
> return pkey * PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> index 291bc1e07842..27759d3ed9cd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -18,12 +18,13 @@
> * do a plain mprotect() to a mprotect_pkey() area and make sure the pkey sticks
> *
> * Compile like this:
> - * gcc -o protection_keys -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm
> - * gcc -m32 -o protection_keys_32 -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm
> + * gcc -mxsave -o protection_keys -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm
> + * gcc -mxsave -m32 -o protection_keys_32 -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm
> */
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #define __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__
> #include <errno.h>
> +#include <linux/elf.h>
> #include <linux/futex.h>
> #include <time.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> @@ -1550,6 +1551,86 @@ void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
> do_not_expect_pkey_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
> }
>
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> +void test_ptrace_modifies_pkru(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
> +{
> + pid_t child;
> + int status, ret;
> + int pkey_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset();
> + size_t xsave_size = cpu_max_xsave_size();
> + void *xsave;
> + u32 *pkey_register;
> + u64 *xstate_bv;
> + struct iovec iov;
> +
> + child = fork();
> + pkey_assert(child >= 0);
> + dprintf3("[%d] fork() ret: %d\n", getpid(), child);
> + if (!child) {
> + u32 pkey_register = read_pkey_reg();
> +
> + ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0);
> + raise(SIGSTOP);
> +
> + /*
> + * need __read_pkey_reg() version so we do not do shadow_pkey_reg
> + * checking
> + */
> + if (pkey_register == __read_pkey_reg())
> + exit(1);
> +
> + raise(SIGSTOP);
> +
> + exit(__read_pkey_reg());
> + }
> +
> + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0));
> + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status);
> + pkey_assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP);
> +
> + xsave = (void *)malloc(xsave_size);
> + pkey_assert(xsave > 0);
> +
> + iov.iov_base = xsave;
> + iov.iov_len = xsave_size;
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + pkey_register = (u32 *)(xsave + pkey_offset);
> + pkey_assert(*pkey_register == read_pkey_reg());
> +
> + *pkey_register = !read_pkey_reg();
> +
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0));
> + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status);
> + pkey_assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP);
> +
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + xstate_bv = (u64 *)(xsave + 512);
> + *xstate_bv &= ~(1 << 9);
> +
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0);
> + pkey_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0));
> + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status);
> + pkey_assert(WIFEXITED(status));
> + pkey_assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0);
> + free(xsave);
LGTM.
May I ask for a bit more in terms of testing the ABI: writing some
non-trivial (not all-zero and not all-ones) value into the PKRU register,
forcing the child task to go through a FPU save/restore context switch
and then reading it back and verifying the value, or something like that?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-06 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-05 23:01 [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: Allow PKRU to be (once again) written by ptrace Kyle Huey
2022-08-05 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace Kyle Huey
2022-08-06 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-08-06 12:46 ` Kyle Huey
2022-08-06 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-06 19:20 ` Kyle Huey
2022-08-06 19:36 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yu4rzf9XI6NzHwne@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.manouchehri@riseup.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox