From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/i915: reduce TLB performance regressions
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:08:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuJ8K7W50VeHNAGX@alfio.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1658924372.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
Hi Mauro,
Pushed in drm-intel-gt-next.
Thanks,
Andi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 02:29:50PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Doing TLB invalidation cause performance regressions, like:
> [424.370996] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* rcs0 TLB invalidation did not complete in 4ms!
>
> As reported at:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6424
>
> as this is an expensive operation. So, reduce the need of it by:
> - checking if the engine is awake;
> - checking if the engine is not wedged;
> - batching operations.
>
> Additionally, add a workaround for a known hardware issue on some GPUs.
>
> In order to double-check that this series won't be introducing any regressions,
> I used this new IGT test:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/495684/?series=106757&rev=1
>
> Checking the results for 3 different patchsets, on Broadwell:
>
> 1) On the top of drm-tip (2022y-07m-14d-08h-35m-36) - e. g. with TLB
> invalidation and serialization patches:
>
> $ sudo build/tests/gem_exec_tlb|grep Subtest
> Subtest close-clear: SUCCESS (10.490s)
> Subtest madv-clear: SUCCESS (10.484s)
> Subtest u-unmap-clear: SUCCESS (10.527s)
> Subtest u-shrink-clear: SUCCESS (10.506s)
> Subtest close-dumb: SUCCESS (10.165s)
> Subtest madv-dumb: SUCCESS (10.177s)
> Subtest u-unmap-dumb: SUCCESS (10.172s)
> Subtest u-shrink-dumb: SUCCESS (10.172s)
>
> 2) With the new version of the batch TLB invalidation patches from this series:
>
> $ sudo build/tests/gem_exec_tlb|grep Subtest
> Subtest close-clear: SUCCESS (10.483s)
> Subtest madv-clear: SUCCESS (10.495s)
> Subtest u-unmap-clear: SUCCESS (10.545s)
> Subtest u-shrink-clear: SUCCESS (10.508s)
> Subtest close-dumb: SUCCESS (10.172s)
> Subtest madv-dumb: SUCCESS (10.169s)
> Subtest u-unmap-dumb: SUCCESS (10.174s)
> Subtest u-shrink-dumb: SUCCESS (10.176s)
>
> 3) Changing the TLB invalidation routine to do nothing[1]:
>
> $ sudo ~/freedesktop-igt/build/tests/gem_exec_tlb|grep Subtest
> (gem_exec_tlb:1958) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1958) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1958) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 3 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1956) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1956) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1956) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 89 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1957) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1957) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1957) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 256 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1960) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1960) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1960) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 845 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1961) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1961) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1961) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 1138 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1954) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1954) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1954) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 1359 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1955) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1955) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1955) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 1794 tries!
> (gem_exec_tlb:1959) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_tlb.c:384:
> (gem_exec_tlb:1959) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !sq
> (gem_exec_tlb:1959) CRITICAL: Found deadbeef in a new (clear) buffer after 2139 tries!
> Dynamic subtest smem0 failed.
> **** DEBUG ****
> (gem_exec_tlb:1944) DEBUG: 2M hole:200000 contains poison:6b6b6b6b
> (gem_exec_tlb:1944) DEBUG: Running writer for 200000 at 300000 on bcs0
> (gem_exec_tlb:1944) DEBUG: Closing hole:200000 on rcs0, sample:deadbeef
> (gem_exec_tlb:1944) DEBUG: Rechecking hole:200000, sample:6b6b6b6b
> **** END ****
> Subtest close-clear: FAIL (10.434s)
> Subtest madv-clear: SUCCESS (10.479s)
> Subtest u-unmap-clear: SUCCESS (10.512s)
>
> In summary, the test does properly detect fail when TLB cache invalidation doesn't happen,
> as shown at result (3). It also shows that both current drm-tip and drm-tip with this series
> applied don't have TLB invalidation cache issues.
>
> [1] I applied this patch on the top of drm-tip:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> index 68c2b0d8f187..0aefcd7be5e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> @@ -930,0 +931,3 @@ void intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(struct intel_gt *gt)
> + // HACK: don't do TLB invalidations!!!
> + return;
> +
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
>
> Chris Wilson (4):
> drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines
> drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations
> drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged
> drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations
>
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2):
> drm/i915/gt: document with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake()
> drm/i915/gt: describe the new tlb parameter at i915_vma_resource
>
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 25 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 77 +++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 12 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 11 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 18 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 33 ++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.c | 9 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.h | 6 +-
> 11 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-28 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-27 12:29 [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/i915: reduce TLB performance regressions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915/gt: document with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 14:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 14:25 ` Andi Shyti
2022-07-27 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/gt: describe the new tlb parameter at i915_vma_resource Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-07-27 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2022-07-28 12:08 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2022-07-28 12:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/i915: reduce TLB performance regressions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuJ8K7W50VeHNAGX@alfio.lan \
--to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox