From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D4BC00144 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235479AbiG2JGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2022 05:06:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235547AbiG2JGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2022 05:06:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D09184EE1; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 02:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id b26so5242148wrc.2; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 02:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=aoZulIv3y36JRZIiQsGvDhyRsXj2GJggkkB5mXQFhe8=; b=QoRLfjAHO6sKauqQzX4lw5ZbE7Y7BXHOewDqAIwlu5yYl26PtUP/NLemRAHi92RAO0 Oy24HCq/rZ1a8ZIHzsBSBT6efHc+ip362E1NWf81a3+VfmLMLZJWMBY+jl/S4r60r8pR JtsaGmuqxVmLKfGmclgdxivdwUZtPu9JHPqkr2nTxfhLn9wIoVo93UwWrgeC3ZtrivhI V6ikdSKKzucBC9yMTOHad0Vhoff73dl1uSkP6Otb99LYWRM9/Bd37tQoJ3dnk9/NkdEH IRZlugnpt/A9ea3lR3bmDOlNRC6YggOs8PnofXPnOv+STYVbuWNWIyfBzyz2zv5NGX8+ WoBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=aoZulIv3y36JRZIiQsGvDhyRsXj2GJggkkB5mXQFhe8=; b=vnM57saCvSuIfVnm7lq/rsKl5s2P9CUHCK0lz0snk6qs/hvo9f/X6jNWtjHP/R2VP/ GG+k5LYT66AuUoBNAzwunLzpHnyGX714yDLPZdWIPr+h1g+2uPHe8/OrSsssof8p1ET1 0/2hCyQ6N0Kl3o5OAECVHB0KZIn2obK5eHJgPuBEOlXt6Obe3hvey8/BU7fx0C5ChNiR xQr1L2oqm61POGf/fjkEGQ+GRYxq+eNihSgsLhbR/HyzWOXmg+U73hLOOaDpn+ZZI+3F BSGfP3tPD/4ia5hQYJxRpXhhplRslogg5y9qbJGe+yZCCQWMe218iqU0N+xlE3YT/Cow ZLOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0zOO1PIPqoxEh5g5iG9KRoauIsbQ16RJB1asLuGM5D0JsxA3m6 4+YHkJoNdW+m0NCCfe1+C0+Vl6Ik4P8TaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7hYytTH2onaLqWvkQZ7NjcLI16AUUpKqMsUJSJq0W3JSLa/aw8cJ2NpQ2GJm3inAswNS9oFw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f108:0:b0:21e:8132:a3d3 with SMTP id r8-20020adff108000000b0021e8132a3d3mr1793420wro.337.1659085561716; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2402:3a80:1968:2207:9bad:2dcb:1b0c:a3b7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4-20020a7bcc84000000b003a325bd8517sm4176078wma.5.2022.07.29.02.05.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Jul 2022 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:05:45 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/101] 5.10.134-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220728150340.045826831@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220728150340.045826831@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:05:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.134 release. > There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:03:14 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220724): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1584 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1587 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip