From: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
hajun.sung@samsung.com, hosung0.kim@samsung.com,
d7271.choe@samsung.com, youngmin.nam@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: correct the prototype of ns_to_kernel_old_timeval and ns_to_timespec64
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:19:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YujB/of1WSWsoHkw@perf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a17d1J7gu0W-0ojxjz8W6C+Pg+xQW8ai=Qw_q94SJAOdQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]
Hi Jone, Thomas.
Could you consider applying this patch ?
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:25:22AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:47 AM Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > In ns_to_kernel_old_timeval() definition,
> > the function argument is defined with const identifier in kernel/time/time.c,
> > but the prototype in include/linux/time32.h looks different.
> >
> > - The function is defined in kernel/time/time.c as below:
> > struct __kernel_old_timeval ns_to_kernel_old_timeval(const s64 nsec)
> >
> > - The function is decalared in include/linux/time32.h as below:
> > extern struct __kernel_old_timeval ns_to_kernel_old_timeval(s64 nsec);
> >
> > Because the variable of arithmethic types isn't modified in the calling scope,
> > there's no need to mark arguments as const.
> > And there is a review in Link[1] why it was omitted during review stage,
> > so they should be matched.
> >
> > Likewise, we can remove the "const" keyword in both definition and declaration
> > of ns_to_timespec64() as it was metentined below Link[2] and Link[3].
> >
> > Link[1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1637458.html
> > Link[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220531064346.51677-1-chanho61.park@samsung.com/T/
> > Link[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a3nknJgEDESGdJH91jMj6R_xydFqWASd8r5BbesdvMBgA@mail.gmail.com
> > Fixes: a84d1169164b ("y2038: Introduce struct __kernel_old_timeval")
> > Signed-off-by: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220712091922epcas2p34d7c89f02780afa58950b103a62eb59a@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-12 9:47 ` [PATCH] time: correct the prototype of ns_to_kernel_old_timeval and ns_to_timespec64 Youngmin Nam
2022-07-12 9:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-02 6:19 ` Youngmin Nam [this message]
2022-08-09 18:04 ` [tip: timers/urgent] time: Correct " tip-bot2 for Youngmin Nam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YujB/of1WSWsoHkw@perf \
--to=youngmin.nam@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chanho61.park@samsung.com \
--cc=d7271.choe@samsung.com \
--cc=hajun.sung@samsung.com \
--cc=hosung0.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox