From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:13:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YukGwkzicp+aNLXx@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3181e52cb86b57f3a98dec4aaab8935f14b683a1.1659077534.git.sander@svanheule.net>
* Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> wrote:
> The maps to keep track of shared caches between CPUs on SMP systems are
> declared in asm/smp.h, among them specifically cpu_llc_shared_map. These
> maps are externally defined in cpu/smpboot.c. The latter is only compiled
> on CONFIG_SMP=y, which means the declared extern symbols from asm/smp.h do
> not have a corresponding definition on uniprocessor builds.
>
> The inline cpu_llc_shared_mask() function from asm/smp.h refers to the map
> declaration mentioned above. This function is referenced in cacheinfo.c
> inside for_each_cpu() loop macros, to provide cpumask for the loop. On
> uniprocessor builds, the symbol for the cpu_llc_shared_map does not exist.
> However, the current implementation of for_each_cpu() also (wrongly)
> ignores the provided mask.
>
> By sheer luck, the compiler thus optimises out this unused reference to
> cpu_llc_shared_map, and the linker therefore does not require the
> cpu_llc_shared_mask to actually exist on uniprocessor builds. Only on SMP
> bulids does smpboot.o exist to provide the required symbols.
>
> To no longer rely on compiler optimisations for successful uniprocessor
> builds, move the definitions of cpu_llc_shared_map and cpu_l2c_shared_map
> from smpboot.c to cacheinfo.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - New patch
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 ----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
I'm also fine with you guys carrying this in the bitmap tree - the x86
impact is incidental.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 7:01 [PATCH v5 0/5] cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-29 7:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions Sander Vanheule
2022-08-02 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-07-29 7:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] cpumask: add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-29 7:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption Sander Vanheule
2022-08-08 16:23 ` [RFC] issue with cpumask for UniProcessor Saurabh Sengar
2022-08-08 17:34 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-29 7:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite Sander Vanheule
2022-07-31 15:23 ` Maíra Canal
2022-07-31 15:42 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-31 22:11 ` Maíra Canal
2022-08-09 18:38 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-29 7:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature Sander Vanheule
2022-07-30 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Yury Norov
2022-07-31 13:02 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-31 15:28 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YukGwkzicp+aNLXx@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox