From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: avoid executing show_state and causing rcu stall warning
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 10:39:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yuo0U2aWUZRLBAsA@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1659489525-82994-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
* Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> If the number of CPUs is large, "sysrq_sched_debug_show" will execute for
> a long time. Every time I execute "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" on my
> 128-core machine, the rcu stall warning will be triggered. Moreover,
> sysrq_sched_debug_show does not need to be protected by rcu_read_lock,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and no rcu stall warning will appear after adjustment.
>
That doesn't mean it doesn't have to be protected by *any* lock - which
your patch implements AFAICS.
There's a couple of lines such as:
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
... which need to be protected against CPU hotplug events.
I haven't checked any of the deeper code to see what RCU or other
protection it may need, but clearly you didn't either ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 1:18 [PATCH] sched/debug: avoid executing show_state and causing rcu stall warning Liu Song
2022-08-03 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-08-03 8:58 ` Liu Song
2022-08-03 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 9:25 ` Liu Song
2022-08-03 12:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-03 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yuo0U2aWUZRLBAsA@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox