From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: fix UAF of ref->proc caused by race condition
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 09:29:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yuoj1GVrgtflsYYZ@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yul9sEAtM+4aGbEg@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 07:40:32PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 06:25:11PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> > A transaction of type BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE can fail to increment the
> > reference for a node. In this case, the target proc normally releases
> > the failed reference upon close as expected. However, if the target is
> > dying in parallel the call will race with binder_deferred_release(), so
> > the target could have released all of its references by now leaving the
> > cleanup of the new failed reference unhandled.
> >
> > The transaction then ends and the target proc gets released making the
> > ref->proc now a dangling pointer. Later on, ref->node is closed and we
> > attempt to take spin_lock(&ref->proc->inner_lock), which leads to the
> > use-after-free bug reported below. Let's fix this by cleaning up the
> > failed reference on the spot instead of relying on the target to do so.
> >
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150
> > Write of size 4 at addr ffff5ca207094238 by task kworker/1:0/590
> >
> > CPU: 1 PID: 590 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8 #10
> > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > Workqueue: events binder_deferred_func
> > Call trace:
> > dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e0
> > show_stack+0x18/0x70
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> > print_report+0x2e4/0x61c
> > kasan_report+0xa4/0x110
> > kasan_check_range+0xfc/0x1a4
> > __kasan_check_write+0x3c/0x50
> > _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150
> > binder_deferred_func+0x5e0/0x9b0
> > process_one_work+0x38c/0x5f0
> > worker_thread+0x9c/0x694
> > kthread+0x188/0x190
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/android/binder.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > index 362c0deb65f1..9d42afe60180 100644
> > --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> > +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > @@ -1361,6 +1361,18 @@ static int binder_inc_ref_for_node(struct binder_proc *proc,
> > }
> > ret = binder_inc_ref_olocked(ref, strong, target_list);
> > *rdata = ref->data;
> > + if (ret && ref == new_ref) {
> > + /*
> > + * Cleanup the failed reference here as the target
> > + * could now be dead and have already released its
> > + * references by now. Calling on the new reference
> > + * with strong=0 and a tmp_refs will not decrement
> > + * the node. The new_ref gets kfree'd below.
> > + */
> > + binder_cleanup_ref_olocked(new_ref);
> > + ref = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > binder_proc_unlock(proc);
> > if (new_ref && ref != new_ref)
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> >
>
> Sorry, I forgot to CC stable. This patch should be applied to all stable
> kernels starting with 4.14 and higher.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Thanks, I'll add this when I queue it up after 5.20-rc1 is out.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-01 18:25 [PATCH] binder: fix UAF of ref->proc caused by race condition Carlos Llamas
2022-08-02 8:13 ` Christian Brauner
2022-08-02 19:40 ` Carlos Llamas
2022-08-03 7:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-08-17 22:04 ` Carlos Llamas
2022-08-18 5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-18 15:48 ` Carlos Llamas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yuoj1GVrgtflsYYZ@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox