public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees 
	<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: Use cpumask_available instead of hardcoded NULL check
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:42:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YupC88xuQ4rcyLVR@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18263030220.8a990e82436929.3216192040531777412@siddh.me>


* Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me> wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:38:19 +0530  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > * Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me> wrote:
> > > There is no reason why allmodconfig would trigger the warning, [...]
> > 
> > Well, unless I'm misreading your changelog, all the warning needs to 
> > trigger is CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.
> > 
> > > as it has CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y, but the warning is because of the 
> > > other case.
> > 
> > What 'other case'? I've re-read the discussion and don't see it, but maybe 
> > I'm a bit daft this morning ...
>  
> No, the warning is happening because CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is not set.

Oh. So I was daft, as suspected. ;-)

And I can confirm that while gcc-11 doesn't trigger the warning, gcc-12 
does:

  $ make ARCH=x86_64 CC=gcc-11 arch/x86/mm/numa.o
    CC      arch/x86/mm/numa.o
  $

  $ rm -f arch/x86/mm/numa.o
  $
  $ make ARCH=x86_64 CC=gcc-12 arch/x86/mm/numa.o

    CC      arch/x86/mm/numa.o
  arch/x86/mm/numa.c: In function ‘cpumask_of_node’:
  arch/x86/mm/numa.c:916:39: error: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘false’ for the address of ‘node_to_cpumask_map’ will never be NULL [-Werror=address]
    916 |         if (node_to_cpumask_map[node] == NULL) {


> [...] This is because in that case cpumask_var_t type is not a pointer, 
> and thus the var can never be NULL, which leads gcc to warn us when 
> comparing with NULL.
> 
> The chain of events are like:
> 
>         #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
>                 typedef struct cpumask *cpumask_var_t;
>         #else
>                 typedef struct cpumask cpumask_var_t[1];
>         endif
> 
>         cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
>         ...
>         if (node_to_cpumask_map[node] == NULL) {
> 
> 
> The fix works because:
> 
>         #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
>                 static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
>                 {
>                         return mask != NULL;
>                 }
>         #else
>                 static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
>                 {
>                         return true;
>                 }
>         endif
> 
> 
> The conditional definitions, as pointed out earlier, can be seen from line 700
> of include/linux/cpumask.h file.

Yeah - and I agree with your fix - will apply it.

Thanks for your patience :-)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-03  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-31 16:09 [PATCH] x86/numa: Use cpumask_available instead of hardcoded NULL check Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-02 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-02 16:29   ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  8:48     ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03  8:58       ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  9:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03  9:21           ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  9:42             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-08-03  9:46               ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03 15:41 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Siddh Raman Pant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YupC88xuQ4rcyLVR@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=code@siddh.me \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox