From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when SPTE masks change
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 00:16:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YusP8FaOCLvq3VFE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d924ec235d9b0fb27f80cb03b02b5c7d8466fec1.camel@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 22:49 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +void __init kvm_mmu_spte_module_init(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Snapshot userspace's desire to allow MMIO caching. Whether or not
> > + * KVM can actually enable MMIO caching depends on vendor-specific
> > + * hardware capabilities and other module params that can't be resolved
> > + * until the vendor module is loaded, i.e. enable_mmio_caching can and
> > + * will change when the vendor module is (re)loaded.
> > + */
> > + allow_mmio_caching = enable_mmio_caching;
>
> ... Perhaps 'use_mmio_caching' or 'want_mmio_caching' is better as it reflects
> userspace's desire? Anyway let you decide.
Part of me likes "want_mmio_caching", but the module param really is only for
testing, i.e. any sane configuration always wants MMIO caching, but sometimes it's
explicitly disallowed purely so that KVM can mimic hardware that doesn't support
MMIO caching.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-04 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 22:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: MMIO caching bug fixes Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Tag kvm_mmu_x86_module_init() with __init Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when SPTE masks change Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:59 ` Kai Huang
2022-08-04 0:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-19 16:21 ` David Matlack
2022-08-19 17:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-24 21:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: SVM: Disable SEV-ES support if MMIO caching is disable Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: MMIO caching bug fixes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YusP8FaOCLvq3VFE@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox