From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Ashok Raj" <ashok_raj@linux.intel.com>,
"X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>, "Andrew Cooper" <amc96@srcf.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ștefan Talpalaru" <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: Attempt applying on every logical thread
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:29:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv0JQGa/2BlbQChZ@araj-dh-work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yvz53AAh+p5Db7CK@zn.tnic>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 04:23:24PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:12:05PM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > Instead of doing a complete hack,
>
> What complete hack?!
What I meant was the patch removed any and all revid checks *completely*
Instead of even limiting to == checks.
Once you do that "in spirit" its the same end goal. Isn't it? Although it
might be required for a completely different reason.
>
> > could we maybe revive what we attempted
> > in 2019? At a minimum it will work for both architectures.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1567056803-6640-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com/
>
> echo 2 >... - now that's a hack.
Its all in the eye of the beholder :-)
I didn't mean in any way to bring back the echo 2. What ever you think is
suitable to enable this is fine.
>
> If you wanna use the kernel for testing your hw, use a local patch. Not
> expose it to people and then have me debug all kind of strange lockups.
So forget the hardware testing part. This is a complex flow for late-load
and how can we get more people to test it today in the community?
Do we have a more scalable way to support it today?
This is similar to XEN supporting, ucode=allow_same, there is precedence.
Doing that is just like having a built-in self-test for microcode loading.
I think there is value in enabling it for x86.
Cheers,
Ashok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-17 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-14 12:00 [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: Attempt applying on every logical thread Borislav Petkov
2022-08-16 9:00 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-16 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-16 16:51 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 12:12 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 14:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 15:29 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-08-17 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 20:58 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 21:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-18 9:58 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-05 3:45 ` Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yv0JQGa/2BlbQChZ@araj-dh-work \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=amc96@srcf.net \
--cc=ashok_raj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox