public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ngupta@vflare.org" <ngupta@vflare.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aleksey Romanov <AVRomanov@sberdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19]
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:53:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvJKwCXewHmuWGdh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809102011.pfhfb4k7tdkqvdai@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>

Hi,

On (22/08/09 10:20), Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> I think oom-kill is an inevitable escape from low memory situation if we
> don't solve original problem with high memory consumption in the user
> setup. Reclaim-based zram slow path just delays oom if memory eating
> root cause is not resolved.
> 
> I totally agree with you that all patches which have visible user
> degradations should be reverted, but maybe this is more user setup
> problem, what do you think?

I'd go with the revert.
Jiri, are you going to send the revert patch or shall I handle it?

> If you make the decision to revert slow path removal patch, I would
> prefer to review the original patch with unneeded code removal again
> if you don't mind:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220422115959.3313-1-avromanov@sberdevices.ru/

Sure, we can return to it after the merge window.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-31 21:43 Linux 5.19 Linus Torvalds
2022-08-01 12:47 ` Build regressions/improvements in v5.19 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-02  9:14   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-01 16:52 ` Linux 5.19 Tony Luck
2022-08-01 16:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-05 17:00 ` Please consider Linux 5.20 because it means "I love Linux" in Chinese (Re: Linux 5.19) Zhang Boyang
2022-08-07 17:21   ` David Laight
2022-08-09  6:03 ` ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19] Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09  7:59   ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09  8:12     ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09  8:43       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09  9:11         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09  9:20           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 10:20             ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-08-09 11:53               ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-08-09 13:15                 ` Aleksey Romanov
2022-08-09 13:29                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-10  7:06                 ` [PATCH] Revert "zram: remove double compression logic" Jiri Slaby
2022-08-10  7:14                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 12:35             ` ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19] Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 12:45               ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 12:57                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 13:07                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09  9:12   ` Lukas Czerner
2022-08-09  9:15     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09  9:53       ` Lukas Czerner
     [not found]   ` <20220830214626.26544-1-charlie39@cock.li>
2022-08-31  7:55     ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-11 14:02 ` [RESEND] Please consider name next Linux release "I love Linux" (Re: Linux 5.19) Zhang Boyang
2022-08-12  2:39   ` Baoquan He
2022-08-12  3:28     ` Huacai Chen
2022-08-12  6:31       ` Gao Xiang
2022-08-12  8:22         ` YanTeng Si
2022-08-13 17:17     ` Zhang Boyang
2022-08-14 15:22     ` WANG Xuerui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvJKwCXewHmuWGdh@google.com \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=AVRomanov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox