From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] perf tests: Fix Track with sched_switch test for hybrid case
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:40:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvPtib5Aslem+gtZ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809080702.6921-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Em Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:06:59AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Hi
>
> Here are a couple of fixes (V2) related to the Track with sched_switch test,
> and a subsequent tidy-up.
>
>
> Changes in V2:
>
> perf parse-events: Fix segfault when event parser gets an error
> Amend commit message to refer to subsequent tidy-up patch
>
> perf tools: Do not pass NULL to parse_events()
> New patch
Thanks, applied to my local branch.
- Arnaldo
>
> Adrian Hunter (3):
> perf parse-events: Fix segfault when event parser gets an error
> perf tests: Fix Track with sched_switch test for hybrid case
> perf tools: Do not pass NULL to parse_events()
>
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/iostat.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/event-times.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/evsel-roundtrip-name.c | 4 ++--
> tools/perf/tests/hists_cumulate.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/hists_filter.c | 4 ++--
> tools/perf/tests/hists_link.c | 4 ++--
> tools/perf/tests/hists_output.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/keep-tracking.c | 4 ++--
> tools/perf/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/switch-tracking.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 4 ++++
> tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/record.c | 2 +-
> 22 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
>
> Regards
> Adrian
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 8:06 [PATCH V2 0/3] perf tests: Fix Track with sched_switch test for hybrid case Adrian Hunter
2022-08-09 8:07 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] perf parse-events: Fix segfault when event parser gets an error Adrian Hunter
2022-08-09 8:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] perf tests: Fix Track with sched_switch test for hybrid case Adrian Hunter
2022-08-09 8:07 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] perf tools: Do not pass NULL to parse_events() Adrian Hunter
2022-08-10 17:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvPtib5Aslem+gtZ@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox