Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements

Tony Lindgren
2022-08-15T10:33:11Z

* Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> [220813 00:45]:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> [220810 05:54]:
> > > Tony,
> > >
> > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the
> > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle
> > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle.
> >
> > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add:
> >
> > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on?
> IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't
> break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we
> have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed
> in the email will get around to testing this series.

Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations
of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board.

> > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the
> > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this
> > series.
>
> I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there.

Ack.

Tony