public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: Fix inaccurate tally of ttwu_move_affine
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:01:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvonlUOgMbla6dSh@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810223313.386614-1-libo.chen@oracle.com>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Libo Chen wrote:
> There are scenarios where non-affine wakeups are incorrectly counted as
> affine wakeups by schedstats.
> 
> When wake_affine_idle() returns prev_cpu which doesn't equal to
> nr_cpumask_bits, it will slip through the check: target == nr_cpumask_bits
> in wake_affine() and be counted as if target == this_cpu in schedstats.
> 
> Replace target == nr_cpumask_bits with target != this_cpu to make sure
> affine wakeups are accurately tallied.
> 
> Fixes: 806486c377e33 (sched/fair: Do not migrate if the prev_cpu is idle)
> Suggested-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index da388657d5ac..b179da4f8105 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6114,7 +6114,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>  		target = wake_affine_weight(sd, p, this_cpu, prev_cpu, sync);
>  
>  	schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_wakeups_affine_attempts);
> -	if (target == nr_cpumask_bits)
> +	if (target != this_cpu)
>  		return prev_cpu;
>  
>  	schedstat_inc(sd->ttwu_move_affine);

This not only changes the accounting but also the placement, no?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 22:33 [PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: Fix inaccurate tally of ttwu_move_affine Libo Chen
2022-08-15 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-08-15 19:19   ` Libo Chen
2022-08-17 13:20     ` Vincent Guittot
2023-01-09 22:00     ` Libo Chen
2023-03-09  3:17       ` Libo Chen
2022-08-25  7:30 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-08-25  9:13   ` Libo Chen
2023-03-30 10:39     ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-04-06 10:05 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Libo Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvonlUOgMbla6dSh@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox