From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Use user_cpus_ptr for saving user provided cpumask in sched_setaffinity()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:41:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yvyp02LLIQQPs5d6@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816192734.67115-2-longman@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:27:32PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> @@ -2981,25 +2969,21 @@ static int restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
> goto err_unlock;
> }
>
> - if (!cpumask_and(new_mask, &p->cpus_mask, subset_mask)) {
> +
> + if (p->user_cpus_ptr)
> + not_empty = cpumask_and(new_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr, subset_mask);
> + else
> + not_empty = cpumask_and(new_mask, cpu_online_mask, subset_mask);
> +
> + if (!not_empty) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_unlock;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * We're about to butcher the task affinity, so keep track of what
> - * the user asked for in case we're able to restore it later on.
> - */
> - if (user_mask) {
> - cpumask_copy(user_mask, p->cpus_ptr);
> - p->user_cpus_ptr = user_mask;
> - }
> -
> return __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked(p, new_mask, 0, rq, &rf);
>
> err_unlock:
> task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
> - kfree(user_mask);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -3049,34 +3033,27 @@ void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
> }
>
> static int
> -__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask);
> +__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask, bool save_mask);
>
> /*
> * Restore the affinity of a task @p which was previously restricted by a
> - * call to force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(). This will clear (and free)
> - * @p->user_cpus_ptr.
> + * call to force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr().
> *
> * It is the caller's responsibility to serialise this with any calls to
> * force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(@p).
> */
> void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - struct cpumask *user_mask = p->user_cpus_ptr;
> - unsigned long flags;
> + const struct cpumask *user_mask = p->user_cpus_ptr;
> +
> + if (!user_mask)
> + user_mask = cpu_online_mask;
>
> /*
> - * Try to restore the old affinity mask. If this fails, then
> - * we free the mask explicitly to avoid it being inherited across
> - * a subsequent fork().
> + * Try to restore the old affinity mask with __sched_setaffinity().
> + * Cpuset masking will be done there too.
> */
> - if (!user_mask || !__sched_setaffinity(p, user_mask))
> - return;
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> - user_mask = clear_user_cpus_ptr(p);
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> -
> - kfree(user_mask);
> + __sched_setaffinity(p, user_mask, false);
> }
>
> void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
Would it not be simpler to write it something like so?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 03053eebb22e..cdae4d50a588 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2955,7 +2955,6 @@ static int restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
struct rq_flags rf;
struct rq *rq;
int err;
- bool not_empty;
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
@@ -2969,13 +2968,7 @@ static int restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
goto err_unlock;
}
-
- if (p->user_cpus_ptr)
- not_empty = cpumask_and(new_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr, subset_mask);
- else
- not_empty = cpumask_and(new_mask, cpu_online_mask, subset_mask);
-
- if (!not_empty) {
+ if (!cpumask_and(new_mask, task_user_cpus(p), subset_mask)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_unlock;
}
@@ -3044,16 +3037,11 @@ __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask, bool save
*/
void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
{
- const struct cpumask *user_mask = p->user_cpus_ptr;
-
- if (!user_mask)
- user_mask = cpu_online_mask;
-
/*
* Try to restore the old affinity mask with __sched_setaffinity().
* Cpuset masking will be done there too.
*/
- __sched_setaffinity(p, user_mask, false);
+ __sched_setaffinity(p, task_user_cpus(p), false);
}
void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 15eefcd65faa..426e9b64b587 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1881,6 +1881,13 @@ static inline void dirty_sched_domain_sysctl(int cpu)
#endif
extern int sched_update_scaling(void);
+
+static inline const struct cpumask *task_user_cpus(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (!p->user_cpus_ptr)
+ return cpus_possible_mask; /* &init_task.cpus_mask */
+ return p->user_cpus_ptr;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#include "stats.h"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-17 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 19:27 [PATCH v5 0/3] sched, cgroup/cpuset: Keep user set cpus affinity Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Use user_cpus_ptr for saving user provided cpumask in sched_setaffinity() Waiman Long
2022-08-17 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-18 14:37 ` Waiman Long
2022-08-17 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-08-18 15:31 ` Waiman Long
2022-08-17 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Provide copy_user_cpus_mask() to copy out user mask Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: Keep user set cpus affinity Waiman Long
2022-08-16 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16 22:11 ` Waiman Long
2022-08-16 22:19 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 0:13 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yvyp02LLIQQPs5d6@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox