public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	geraldsc@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: fix double free of GS and RI CBs on fork() failure
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:01:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwXavKvCjHp9a84E@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816155407.537372-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:54:07AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The pointers for guarded storage and runtime instrumentation control
> blocks are stored in the thread_struct of the associated task. These
> pointers are initially copied on fork() via arch_dup_task_struct()
> and then cleared via copy_thread() before fork() returns. If fork()
> happens to fail after the initial task dup and before copy_thread(),
> the newly allocated task and associated thread_struct memory are
> freed via free_task() -> arch_release_task_struct(). This results in
> a double free of the guarded storage and runtime info structs
> because the fields in the failed task still refer to memory
> associated with the source task.
> 
> This problem can manifest as a BUG_ON() in set_freepointer() (with
> CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED enabled) or KASAN splat (if enabled)
> when running trinity syscall fuzz tests on s390x. To avoid this
> problem, clear the associated pointer fields in
> arch_dup_task_struct() immediately after the new task is copied.
> Note that the RI flag is still cleared in copy_thread() because it
> resides in thread stack memory and that is where stack info is
> copied.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks for debugging and fixing this!

Vasily, could you pick this one up, and also add the Fixes: and Cc:
stable tags as proposed by Gerald?
Thanks!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16 15:54 [PATCH] s390: fix double free of GS and RI CBs on fork() failure Brian Foster
2022-08-17 11:09 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-08-17 18:39   ` Brian Foster
2022-08-24  8:01 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2022-08-24  9:59   ` Vasily Gorbik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwXavKvCjHp9a84E@osiris \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=geraldsc@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox