From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E0DC28D13 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238663AbiHYIot (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 04:44:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57684 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238314AbiHYIor (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 04:44:47 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0EC5242; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 01:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804B6B8279B; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54D85C433C1; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:44:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661417082; bh=aCyaJKYxssGCUyveotG+dEi4n9B/PIjkg/NM6zSggNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NEP6s4U1kw+CrErlJSp1KMONAbJU3r6e+Ir4J85Gf6FuumKdAjlQX1cJmOcQE3v8Y QcXAwy8q+EIRiO6gYN8jPr7uGsPKrSUZioZRNiFGyzkFNDmLDEHwlNo8GB4piYz/UD sCpOnPp9zfStnHEa6g9vOjYUEkZHSHQRSiCLQBY/XtM3keD0joDB1y4tizPMRhIadz SzECgBlX/ZpDpZmMqvBfOmUXQGOuvB/yxlIvn7b+Mj6dMR4eGuh3U2tFtnBlS9YK+d wqWC+9zwdqX4AGUx8UoEE8HkUFOH8ZOBq6PNR8gJ9xSmhCiVp4f5t6mLyTN4ILXA+q AMABAU8lkOXDw== Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:14:36 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Serge Semin Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Serge Semin , Gustavo Pimentel , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Jingoo Han , Frank Li , Alexey Malahov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/24] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add RP/EP local DMA controllers support Message-ID: References: <20220822185332.26149-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20220823154526.GB6371@thinkpad> <20220824140759.7gg7t53z2xi7jxaj@mobilestation> <20220825050457.esxb4oc6yht5kw6o@mobilestation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220825050457.esxb4oc6yht5kw6o@mobilestation> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25-08-22, 08:04, Serge Semin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:12:23AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 24-08-22, 17:07, Serge Semin wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:15:26PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 09:53:08PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > > > I've tested this series on Qualcomm SM8450 SoC based dev board. So, > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > Not sure what is the merging strategy for this one but this series should get > > > > merged into a single tree. Since the PCI patch is touching the designware > > > > driver, merging the series into dmaengine tree might result in conflict later. > > > > > > Right, the series > > > [PATCH v5 00/20] PCI: dwc: Add generic resources and Baikal-T1 support > > > is supposed to be merged in first. Then this one will get to be > > > applied with no conflicts. That's what I imply in the head of the > > > cover-letter. > > > > > I dont see a dependency of dma patches with PCIe patches? I guess they > > could go thru the respective trees now..? > > There is a backward dependency: the PCIe patch in this series depends > on the eDMA patches and the patches in the patchset #3. So should you What is the dependency...? Looking at the patches there does not seem to be one... > merge the eDMA patches via your tree, the later patch in this series > and the patchset #3 would have needed to be applied in there too. So > the patches can't be split up between different branches. Seeing all > the changes (including the DW eDMA part) concern the PCIe device (DW > eDMA is a part of either DW PCIe End-point or Root Port) and we > already agreed to merge all the changes via the PCIe tree, I would > stick to the previous settled agreement. > > -Sergey > > > > > -- > > ~Vinod -- ~Vinod