Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/virt/vSMP: new driver

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:38:46PM +0000, Czerwacki, Eial wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:02:12PM +0000, Czerwacki, Eial wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:41:28AM +0000, Czerwacki, Eial wrote:
> >> >> >On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:16:59AM +0000, Czerwacki, Eial wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >And why is your version file a binary file?  It should just be a small
> >> >> >> >> >text string, right?
> >> >> >> >> not so small, it can reach up to 512kb.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >That was not obvious at all.  Please document this.
> >> >> >> where should the document be?
> >> >> >> in the code as a comment or in another file?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >In the Documentation/ABI/ file that describes this file.
> >> >> ok, will place it there
> >> >> 
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >And how in the world is a "version" that big?  What exactly does this
> >> >> >> >contain?
> >> >> >> it 's size depends on the number of resources it uses.
> >> >> >> here is an example:
> >> >> >> :~> cat /sys/hypervisor/vsmp/version  
> >> >> >> SAP vSMP Foundation: 10.6.2862.0 (Aug 22 2022 15:21:02)
> >> >> >> System configuration:
> >> >> >>    Boards:      2
> >> >> >>       1 x Proc. + I/O + Memory
> >> >> >>       1 x NVM devices (Amazon.com Amazon EC2 NVMe Instance Storage)
> >> >> >>    Processors:  1, Cores: 2, Threads: 4
> >> >> >>        Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8124M CPU @ 3.00GHz Stepping 04
> >> >> >>    Memory (MB): 30976 (of 103192), Cache: 7527, Private: 64689
> >> >> >>       1 x  6400MB    [ 7825/ 321/ 1104]      
> >> >> >>       1 x 24576MB    [95367/7206/63585]       00:1f.0#1
> >> >> >>    Boot device: [HDD] NVMe: Amazon Elastic Block Store        
> >> >> >> Supported until: Aug 22 2024
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That is crazy, and is not a version.  It's a "configuration".
> >> >> it is called version for history reasons...
> >> >
> >> >There is no "history" here, you can create whatever sane interface you
> >> >want right now, there is no backwards compatible issues involved at all.
> >> you are correct, however, it depends on how much change the hypervisor code requires
> >> if any (latter is preferable)
> >
> >I do not understand, again, what tool consumes this today?
> there are monitoring utils that parses it.

What exact tools are you referring to, and why can you not change them?
Where is the source for them?

thanks,

greg k-h