From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:09:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwkMQsUn7BLPi5mU@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <630908d7e6937_259e5b29445@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:54:31AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> How about:
>
> ---
>
> When memory poison consumption machine checks fire,
> mce-notifier-handlers like nfit_handle_mce() record the impacted
> physical address range.
... which is reported by the hardware in the MCi_MISC MSR.
> The error information includes data about blast
> radius, i.e. how many cachelines did the hardware determine are
> impacted.
Yap, nice.
> A recent change, commit 7917f9cdb503 ("acpi/nfit: rely on
> mce->misc to determine poison granularity"), updated nfit_handle_mce()
> to stop hard coding the blast radius value of 1 cacheline, and instead
> rely on the blast radius reported in 'struct mce' which can be up to 4K
> (64 cachelines).
>
> It turns out that apei_mce_report_mem_error() had a similar problem in
> that it hard coded a blast radius of 4K rather than checking the blast
s/checking/reading/
> radius in the error information. Fix apei_mce_report_mem_error() to
s/in/from/
> convey the proper poison granularity.
>
> ---
Yap, that's a lot better.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 19:50 [PATCH v7] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware Jane Chu
2022-08-03 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-08 20:58 ` Jane Chu
2022-08-08 23:30 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-23 16:38 ` Jane Chu
2022-08-23 16:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 16:58 ` Luck, Tony
2022-08-25 16:29 ` Jane Chu
2022-08-25 22:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-26 17:54 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-26 18:09 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-08-26 22:11 ` Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwkMQsUn7BLPi5mU@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox