From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39AAECAAD3 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229861AbiINL3U (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:29:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229588AbiINL3S (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:29:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47407675C for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 04:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id i19so10777808pgi.1 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 04:29:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=CoKHDRm8Jaz5Qk+1uveIVhRWyeBv4ZOetyaTYsfBbTE=; b=HrNcpFcjE+4Z6gAn7bab9zBCK24FgV1k2QLj6FmYv9CSHRHAx0vhPpw/1DdgTYz4lP UqYiTQsFHxQZB1CyrWj0GcpZvcpAnybz6Rj1BiSBCqWel6pWT69XWLpy30E0wgSLtM5Q dgUcitZHo6OPUwaWr11rYLRHfcLpfXIvV4ick= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=CoKHDRm8Jaz5Qk+1uveIVhRWyeBv4ZOetyaTYsfBbTE=; b=QWfaWFCdT1YgGPDf8ESduHn/0KZuixJalih8Ht67aPVSW37fbW70tzwRAdTbRpgM4i 6JO466CTbb+eEkuNf2tiQY/azauqjducM6CrICyJQHCv7wCVPs4L85VetgK9HjnMxt1N wVcx8DQ4fu3mqJUlP1a3CcV0X7kyKL1lypy+z+GD/Yc4LmUZT2ZHFwL0zKDNI8Y/PbnZ 1ySjAIxEvbpJ0resMHcOSCqqqdX0pq86aMo9U5DW+Ty+GfFfFo2+i57Pj9ksg37BFmct Qu+j3h9dzbVdohP7Vmwst1p5H/QbJR4hOG4TE6FV2XenpU41m7saNkDIqF5H7/AdhB0p Jz1A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0ShlkCNRb1ISYoau5jj8NMEE7hRdScHUD4AAHLoxUN3j0PhwCr 3+Ev1UVIcJK5GeXWa8L2DjtDgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7dPTa5V/CzLJDPzyZcuxWtpmT6k3u2L4MDGgxXRRVfmon7zDE4RukDjHj62LZIoErt0FlCrw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:824a:0:b0:438:8ba3:fb6a with SMTP id w71-20020a63824a000000b004388ba3fb6amr21299152pgd.49.1663154957265; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 04:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([240f:75:7537:3187:e5f0:cfaf:bc8c:558e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jb21-20020a170903259500b00176683cde9bsm10317065plb.294.2022.09.14.04.29.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 04:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:29:10 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , John Ogness , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Daniel Vetter , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Helge Deller , Jason Wessel , Daniel Thompson Subject: Re: [patch RFC 02/29] printk: Declare log_wait properly Message-ID: References: <20220910221947.171557773@linutronix.de> <20220910222300.466273303@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220910222300.466273303@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (22/09/11 00:27), Thomas Gleixner wrote: > kernel/printk/printk.c:365:1: warning: symbol 'log_wait' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky