From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB474ECAAD8 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230378AbiINJgm (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:36:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230232AbiINJgK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:36:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976A018379; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id z14-20020a05600c0a0e00b003b486df42a3so6008067wmp.2; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=kmvJ2i5qNx+TtqBPYiaV+mzGvISiYnETNZ0WDnJbQTQ=; b=g8/GnPdYkET5fl8L6iBsXvIwzIP5u5WeNVHr2852lJ4pOzBqRX8stn+TAbI01kBaUw OdIanaUJNWNOnybBsJUEJFxnBs1ZchwqJ0TQ27puZS/HizfU6MWuCLLrOiC1OHNGSNSH KVIUjC0wEo2/rKZOiwf/yVboDzVPMy1MATzK3WYfb9QN6SUpQz1MfDLs3vWi9nAAAWR8 KKj6mJbb68G4Fpl5VEnJ32siJVfCAFMwqOtddNEmuZ7TmBL71w/sEHQptsoE9WlHh2jt j9S+ljXeV8iiFIsRx+CI1qLrnw6TwCBfbzKfPjYD/R99Atrw7gPLttyRrpvx2JZCXkJD BLbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=kmvJ2i5qNx+TtqBPYiaV+mzGvISiYnETNZ0WDnJbQTQ=; b=Du9MgCbEuKelo7XdS/Cb/azteO90nNLD6VlFYKql0XpIFfag8/rvRFQrelm371OXdb f6eh2nxwioDjZdrLf2T5hCEAjezyU05W3gbf/AhqY/ahAbybCheIpLa52phY6mUvp/g7 2V9A1b0iU338gQgGQBtvSEkYinhoLHh32fIn45K6ps9e8soz7050EU6LKbyBBKJJaMoX 3XaHIhg14jBt59QEtX2z2Do6KdVlFgGTgn3bES5XMrjt22WJS50t0u+gKm2ERXz8zYJY 33BFXZV1Wo9ojpuOz8hjJAw58xCRzH3CAzTh877fgEfmK6b04YIPO1sPMLER9rmbn2fm kj3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2EzFua0Wo5NDkQ7b0AnR+6iiHt/9VT9A1S9qdUBG7vGJnHG4sp fs468aw/Smh1LNlD015QdIo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6Ty/E0e8juaS33fD0vAQVyjXZj+utYZYlLoFxANfnSTAz+dpUDQjAxylRbo764s9BDa5TJ2g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4cc:0:b0:3b4:757b:492f with SMTP id g12-20020a7bc4cc000000b003b4757b492fmr2432394wmk.74.1663148039061; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o19-20020a05600c4fd300b003b3180551c8sm17296841wmq.40.2022.09.14.02.33.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:33:56 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/79] 4.19.257-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220913140348.835121645@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220913140348.835121645@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.257 release. > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:03:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1816 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip