From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57703ECAAD3 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229852AbiINJmx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:42:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229512AbiINJm1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:42:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8AE31B792; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id c2-20020a1c3502000000b003b2973dafb7so15091217wma.2; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=J0LC+Huazpj9YGje83L6Ih16ffsvRXN1EA4iW9igUKk=; b=RQWliQxiog6x7JAou5Dp5ryYMEQPtDx5gNS5F4sLRFg81RCvUQiVfwUNu6i7QT97UI tSt5k7QtApaQ49XecKqtm5pDc1PZE0lu1oa+bOI1e+L2ZE5WOfAC6e/VsM2eAyCuZg5/ QxTInx+cfyCJ+2GLdboHg8c6Eza+2lQlSqM/7+32BySyhc3YECXe8zzlCJcGYpxGrO1C fSo0bviasEQjnn4Xm9E3itHLlJCqf7BJrTgmeFT5qy+fhN/xvOBTEozjOUBeIaFjq8L3 tg/hGtKGe1UNqiJiz3m7mGkqgthYMc/lqlJtaOIdR/4UQBrvb/q+Ft29gSqV+bC88snx X4yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=J0LC+Huazpj9YGje83L6Ih16ffsvRXN1EA4iW9igUKk=; b=Q3fg4vIVQ9CYAfEFimvOdoM21ixrSSJX6S61y5r+F3D9/jpw4Xd2sYpdZOPyFHjANu hc4Hx6bU6Y2pqYiuM1SfQrG0BRfxXUe0jgaK3OGVKqp/jsJery9DLb9bkB9InmHGQDG4 uX0jZUIceGRZuKdBhPjW21RoeFJN/JEsJRlFONbV/DP9/0mYaWztkw/1FI51/Omi9q8L B+mZCprIr3HQ5vwbIpBZH96CqjHgvFbT2oF9SJ+YrmP26tRPA2fWvVPMlXe4o4dPBs3l ewJN8oeNN8XL+ZZivNs/hcDOYHQcizF3MnLN0hLga3qEvQ2G3KDiSv8W9CAyKnsZ9m25 lP3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0eHJIuv11Pvxts/Wwl3QXKB6EwOwYpgbkXdgLND+aqS9jXcD4Z MEHOdzCo58ei4rGzmT6cOVc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4V+VTaO1TPY9VQQXvLfuqnMiOFq4PVE8jYus+mOXgoM0EYlNOw2+8htjLJn69RJrpUdxY2YQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c2a9:0:b0:3a6:2400:722c with SMTP id c9-20020a7bc2a9000000b003a62400722cmr2353042wmk.108.1663148522165; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020a5d52c9000000b00229e0def760sm13154403wrv.88.2022.09.14.02.42.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:41:59 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/192] 5.19.9-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220913140410.043243217@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220913140410.043243217@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:01:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.9 release. > There are 192 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:03:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1821 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1826 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1828 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip