From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08314ECAAD8 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230433AbiINJjQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:39:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53180 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230332AbiINJjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:39:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6732C6F; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id b5so24718995wrr.5; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:39:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=USQG9UiTTVxiR1ZIl3PeckbasEWI8JhNB+SIpCx4f4k=; b=Y1DBcBHKXXNIt4cheeGCONdEIbrtpszcZ3AunonF0jX2Po08/Az5y0MJWctIwTZt3D hEbM2y8AGXgPQyyelKDMSyAK3jGJXB7H0w2s9FC+O7+wzHMxdxFtnaCg3SawRFXjj2YB MqnLSd0vhvouxfF+56dM7nL5XzbAh1rXYLfYVFh3YBds36QV832el2bgUtB8ZRkRmG5U 05RzQiw+mTg112OqaxmtqIzZ4jsaygcPdYCIRX0VBGq5nATNjpnPc/LhtOu/j9l4HF+P uTBsJ7rDx8Psq5dqFnANxzF8nGGaI0wGpwKkv75fckP5OLqmiGWcw0lfzMZ9ioWVRQ3F FBQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=USQG9UiTTVxiR1ZIl3PeckbasEWI8JhNB+SIpCx4f4k=; b=RWJ7iz0trAfOE4+CBuOkwakOFgMFctWc4yulZWWCFYtwGAim74jGWQveYUbOxojrAU GaaV3l7BsXRrObz+OdQraeRqB4AIzaTrm1uhQQDMJaFWqk+B/bh+FjhvQtof5sE0yhpc 3rF1uWjztHVsvf5Q2Vio9VAkJCtu2LU1jXtQzGT/IRVfZIs7nBTO7T984PUwaydZUf9Z 4PgvocQlse1YN0+1sRZyRnnSe1DBnBL+I0KD0F9DZynyJR60bex0uwbr+5VZ+ew1xnaN 7L2PaOLw7V+uIqPJV14Hv0av4HML/f/bnJ8ZqNw+rSFzyMcxeWd25fDjg/mJlWvqB1IR MaXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo06q3cc6JykT5aBYR0nHRMVS7pxmJ/TVSlmSaiOgrVPl7uQIyY9 iIvaSyinQ8HmQ815N6WFiOo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5+hg4yX2MqtsoU0t8Yyzywo0BIBOaiWsBKxIF0+1AuAjP+D2xH8B9E83erFi5aN6Aic6Yihw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef06:0:b0:228:d60c:cf74 with SMTP id e6-20020adfef06000000b00228d60ccf74mr20750760wro.302.1663148340650; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m22-20020a05600c4f5600b003a83ca67f73sm19005661wmq.3.2022.09.14.02.38.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:38:58 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/79] 5.10.143-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220913140350.291927556@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220913140350.291927556@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:04:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.143 release. > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:03:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1818 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1823 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip