From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Lennert Buytenhek" <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O page faults from 8250_mid PCIe UART after TIOCVHANGUP
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:09:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyGoZLTFhYQvlf+P@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyF/dogp/0C87zLb@wantstofly.org>
+Cc: Ilpo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:15:02AM +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On an Intel SoC with several 8250_mid PCIe UARTs built into the CPU, I
> can reliably trigger I/O page faults if I invoke TIOCVHANGUP on any of
> the UARTs and then re-open that UART.
>
> Invoking TIOCVHANGUP appears to clear the MSI address/data registers
> in the UART via tty_ioctl() -> tty_vhangup() -> __tty_hangup() ->
> uart_hangup() -> uart_shutdown() -> uart_port_shutdown() ->
> univ8250_release_irq() -> free_irq() -> irq_domain_deactivate_irq() ->
> __irq_domain_deactivate_irq() -> msi_domain_deactivate() ->
> __pci_write_msi_msg():
>
> [root@icelake ~]# lspci -s 00:1a.0 -vv | grep -A1 MSI:
> Capabilities: [40] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
> Address: fee00278 Data: 0000
> [root@icelake ~]# cat hangup.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> ioctl(1, TIOCVHANGUP);
>
> return 0;
> }
> [root@icelake ~]# gcc -Wall -o hangup hangup.c
> [root@icelake ~]# ./hangup > /dev/ttyS4
> [root@icelake ~]# lspci -s 00:1a.0 -vv | grep -A1 MSI:
> Capabilities: [40] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
> Address: 00000000 Data: 0000
> [root@icelake ~]#
>
> Opening the serial port device again while the UART is in this state
> then appears to cause the UART to generate an interrupt
The interrupt is ORed three: DMA Tx, DMA Rx and UART itself.
Any of them can be possible, but to be sure, can you add:
dev_info(p->dev, "FISR: %x\n", fisr);
into dnv_handle_irq() before any other code and see which bits we actually got
there before the crash?
(If it floods the logs, dev_info_ratelimited() may help)
> before the
> MSI vector has been set up again, causing a DMA write to I/O virtual
> address zero:
>
> [root@icelake console]# echo > /dev/ttyS4
> [ 979.463307] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 3
> [ 979.469409] DMAR: [DMA Write NO_PASID] Request device [00:1a.0] fault addr 0x0 [fault reason 0x05] PTE Write access is not set
>
> I'm guessing there's something under tty_open() -> uart_open() ->
> tty_port_open() -> uart_port_activate() -> uart_port_startup() ->
> serial8250_do_startup() that triggers a UART interrupt before the
> MSI vector has been set up again.
>
> I did a quick search but it didn't seem like this is a known issue.
Thanks for your report and reproducer! Yes, I also never heard about such an
issue before. Ilpo, who is doing more UART work nowadays, might have an idea,
I hope.
I'm a bit busy with other stuff right now.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-14 7:15 I/O page faults from 8250_mid PCIe UART after TIOCVHANGUP Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-14 10:09 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-09-14 11:10 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-14 13:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-15 16:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-16 11:47 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-16 12:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-16 13:18 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-19 13:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-19 14:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-19 14:22 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-19 13:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-19 14:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyGoZLTFhYQvlf+P@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox