public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:30:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyLwsOBXv9jRw/+n@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYB6dZf4TBhfXB2Z5E2PJ46ctAM_QKLiW-fykbCopcVGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 4:23 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > After sleeping on this, I'm even more in disagreement with renaming
> > value to state.
> 
> OK let's not do that then.
> 
> > OTOH, I totally agree with the addition of GPIOD_ACTIVE/INACTIVE to be
> > used for the logical cases, and even a script to apply it globally.
> > Ideally that script would change both the calls to the logical functions
> > to use ACTIVE/INACTIVE, and the physical to HIGH/LOW.
> 
> OK we have consensus on this.
> 
> > Introducing enums for those, and changing the function signatures to
> > use those rather than int makes sense to me too.
> 
> Either they can be enum or defined to bool true/false. Not really
> sure what is best. But intuitively enum "feels better" for me.
> 

Enums work for me - especially if the goal is to differentiate
logical from physical - there should be a distinct enum for each.

> > Though I'm not sure
> > why that has to wait until after all users are changed to the new macros.
> > Would that generate lint warnings?
> 
> I rather want it all to happen at once. One preparatory commit
> adding the new types and one sed script to refactor the whole
> lot. Not gradual switchover.
> 
> The reason is purely administrative: we have too many refactorings
> lagging behind, mainly the GPIO descriptors that have been
> lagging behind for what is it? 5 years? 10? GPIO irqchips also dragged
> out for way too long. We can't keep doing things gradually like
> this, it takes too much time and effort.
> 
> I don't want any more "in-transition-indefinitely" stuff in the GPIO
> subsystem if I can avoid it.
> 
> Therefore I would advice to switch it all over at the end of a merge
> window and be done with it.
> 

Agreed - do it all at once.  My question was specific to the change of the
function signatures to using enums - what is to prevent us doing that
before running the sed script, and have the script switch usage over to
the enums?

Cheers,
Kent.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-15  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-06 20:43 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: histb: switch to using gpiod API Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: " Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 21:16   ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-06 21:26     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 21:40       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 21:42         ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-06 21:41       ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-06 21:52         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 22:09           ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-06 22:41             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-11 12:58               ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-14 10:35               ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-14 12:10                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-09-14 12:48                   ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-14 13:00                   ` Kent Gibson
2022-09-14 13:36                     ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-15  2:23                   ` Kent Gibson
2022-09-15  8:51                     ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-15  9:30                       ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2022-09-16  7:22                         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-09-18 14:37                           ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-18 23:58                           ` Kent Gibson
2022-09-08  8:42     ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-07  4:11   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-09 20:10   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-06 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: histb: " Pali Rohár
2022-09-06 21:41   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 21:46     ` Pali Rohár
2022-09-08  8:37 ` Linus Walleij
2022-11-11 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-11-11 15:20   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-14 10:58 ` (subset) " Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyLwsOBXv9jRw/+n@sol \
    --to=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox