From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55824ECAAD3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229657AbiIQOHb (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:07:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbiIQOH3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:07:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF782F388; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id t7so40252120wrm.10; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:07:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=HBhD/3Y3FZtAn1EX0FX5OyvA/53I5mO3MmIG7irpdTI=; b=O44aT8+T/5/UeEZ0skuUxyjaUHBecKl5T+OuXVYvl9EnBmm7PpCbu2Gkm0ZG8rIZhr u+eQcR1IEfIeCZQN/l8MpUrzboBD7YwHoHB288tw8EJT2rtN7dEsWaa5Sv96E65ZSpeF nooY+pvdCwVN5BNNxl/jbplFeLB8xzxwDeoMKoXkhKpXZpVg4D/2edsUSOrKe39UjWbu i6FGGGUtpDYXYstCostHUVubEHh0dZUSvkiv/6NuXES6jdOscYNxlJD0MBTG6lNitS8N ryPWPwpyFppBLDlSYlNRaTKrQ1iuafQKKtC2HjopSaENCOnwsNcduhe3C612vywjgSDv qE5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=HBhD/3Y3FZtAn1EX0FX5OyvA/53I5mO3MmIG7irpdTI=; b=6zcZhYum6k3Mwbwwbc/iXcOitdaRUPL0b8XJTmpOnWBAbTqt0ewFbrGI1erLSDjUNu CS4xTalAhl0a6Z+WSZ0GkKAZbdFMcBHBA5/DLMoD4gkpxwAiyNSyx0PrkhDqgiwn126F Cm6xNSMlUV+oqlK50GIaQnMJ7xccE8vOal/G5IScCTz81Tkr4mm2514coK3HXS81SEmg 6xPGbeOjkTy+cRK/lL4q6Vgdk9l6uehiZL/QaMsSoXSTY4lz4r9pyog+DkMdC8s8ErNu bGXhwPpqb21nDXFET58Mm3xn3NbguWq2I8OFUNbFHg8GK6kh9D8FuoSQKcfKJ5f5YYMJ KUag== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3+1S8U4N0RLVAJzjj/eRUXO/2y6HQnoGfDsFh4phQpub02W36y ZNbbc+qC9hOn4QY//y4MjTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7F5OC8G5qChx7h01p6i1fo2dzMJyrUY2K/RcKfNCfy6JsNxPmQ6kqypmAZ86Pirtc7SzWoFA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1048:b0:228:6898:aa50 with SMTP id c8-20020a056000104800b002286898aa50mr5684117wrx.233.1663423645929; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13-20020adfff8d000000b0022ae59d472esm2858694wrr.112.2022.09.17.07.07.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:07:23 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/24] 5.10.144-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220916100445.354452396@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220916100445.354452396@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:08:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.144 release. > There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1844 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1847 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip