From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26270ECAAD8 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230292AbiITMNE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:13:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230365AbiITMMr (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:12:47 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6CA6B8D2; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 05:12:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1663675958; x=1695211958; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=e8a/x35vyOCwISTweIxR3wnUES3MlUkr8sKyPLn6Tc8=; b=CQZShiEDWbpXvyXcdK6qdzkgtHSC5JMqFxQo5XPtfZkGwMMU6+PFx1zv Y7pLnElO6DhW2sP4YsBzQjMq2RK/DshUHm6AUycuRjdIe3vS8nNNQUbL6 UhuC38mpr9WTeOZIUtYcQZ5Zf/9o/xUO6hw11wZWMGLhF/PebD+nfQi5X NIBFom0P83VSHJO1/xoUGnLgyPgVvV3IZA+m7AbxAP57jTaKVJlHo3JPy a3seFFJ9iKB0DbmKfNXR51cf4j96VrNpZsgSLVEv4yUYfkFYWuQ0em8Z7 zze0sn1OxLE5+m2cuRwixZopzKmbawKrer301xoRqygp9qGXu1q5/b20R g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10475"; a="299666103" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,330,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="299666103" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Sep 2022 05:12:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,330,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="707969050" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2022 05:12:36 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oac77-004yyw-0V; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:12:33 +0300 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:12:32 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Jianqun Xu , linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.or, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] gpiolib: make gpiochip_find_by_name to be common function Message-ID: References: <20220920011747.824280-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:39:59AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 3:17 AM Jianqun Xu wrote: > > > > Move find_chip_by_name from gpiolib to the gpio/driver.h, also rename to > > gpiochip_find_by_name, make it to be a common function. > > Why did you resend it immediately? I'm also puzzled with this. It's not the first time you resend the lot for the unknown reasons. > And what is the reason for this change? First of all, it's Suggested-by: me (missed tag), second, it should be a part of the patch set to answer your question. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko