Re: [V2 PATCH 7/8] Kvm: selftests: x86: Execute cpu specific vmcall instruction

[David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:04:47AM +0000, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> Update the vmcall instruction invocation to happen according to the cpu
> type.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h    | 8 ++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c | 2 +-
>  .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c    | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c  | 2 +-

What's the reason to use kvm_hypercall() for these tests? All of these
are Intel-specific. i.e. is_amd_cpu() will always return false.

>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> index 18a8a6a2b786..74893a7a80f8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> @@ -833,6 +833,14 @@ void vm_set_page_table_entry(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  uint64_t kvm_hypercall(uint64_t nr, uint64_t a0, uint64_t a1, uint64_t a2,
>  		       uint64_t a3);
>  
> +/*
> + * Execute vmcall instruction.
> + */
> +static inline void vmcall(void)
> +{
> +	kvm_hypercall(0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
>  void nested_guest_vmcall(void);
>  
>  void __vm_xsave_require_permission(int bit, const char *name);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c
> index 5abecf06329e..8180711c8684 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>  static void l2_guest_code(void)
>  {
>  	/* Exit to L1 */
> -	__asm__ __volatile__("vmcall");
> +	vmcall();
>  }
>  
>  static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages, unsigned long high_gpa)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
> index 465a9434d61c..37da9d01d5d6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void l2_guest_code(void)
>  	check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L2);
>  
>  	/* exit to L1 */
> -	__asm__ __volatile__("vmcall");
> +	vmcall();
>  }
>  
>  static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c
> index 5943187e8594..00192f564d9b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void l2_guest_code(void)
>  	check_ia32_tsc_adjust(-2 * TSC_ADJUST_VALUE);
>  
>  	/* Exit to L1 */
> -	__asm__ __volatile__("vmcall");
> +	vmcall();
>  }
>  
>  static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)
> -- 
> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>