From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/8] ublk_drv: requeue rqs with recovery feature enabled
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:28:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyuqV1sauPRUjug8@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921095849.84988-5-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 05:58:45PM +0800, ZiyangZhang wrote:
> With recovery feature enabled, in ublk_queue_rq or task work
> (in exit_task_work or fallback wq), we requeue rqs instead of
> ending(aborting) them. Besides, No matter recovery feature is enabled
> or disabled, we schedule monitor_work immediately.
>
> Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 3bdac4bdf46f..b940e490ebab 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -655,6 +655,19 @@ static void ubq_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res)
>
> #define UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS 3
>
> +static inline void __ublk_abort_rq_in_task_work(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> + struct request *rq)
> +{
> + pr_devel("%s: %s q_id %d tag %d io_flags %x.\n", __func__,
> + (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq)) ? "requeue" : "abort",
> + ubq->q_id, rq->tag, ubq->ios[rq->tag].flags);
> + /* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
> + if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq))
> + blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
> + else
> + blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> +}
> +
> static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
> {
> struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> @@ -677,7 +690,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_rq_task_work(struct request *req)
> * (2) current->flags & PF_EXITING.
> */
> if (unlikely(current != ubq->ubq_daemon || current->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
> - blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> + __ublk_abort_rq_in_task_work(ubq, req);
> mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &ub->monitor_work, 0);
> return;
> }
> @@ -752,6 +765,20 @@ static void ublk_rq_task_work_fn(struct callback_head *work)
> __ublk_rq_task_work(req);
> }
>
> +static inline blk_status_t __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> + struct request *rq)
> +{
> + pr_devel("%s: %s q_id %d tag %d io_flags %x.\n", __func__,
> + (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq)) ? "requeue" : "abort",
> + ubq->q_id, rq->tag, ubq->ios[rq->tag].flags);
> + /* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
> + if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq)) {
> + blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
> + return BLK_STS_OK;
> + }
> + return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +}
> +
Please remove the two added logging, otherwise this patch looks fine.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 9:58 [PATCH V4 0/8] ublk_drv: add USER_RECOVERY support ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 1/8] ublk_drv: check 'current' instead of 'ubq_daemon' ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 2/8] ublk_drv: refactor ublk_cancel_queue() ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 3/8] ublk_drv: define macros for recovery feature and check them ZiyangZhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 4/8] ublk_drv: requeue rqs with recovery feature enabled ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22 0:28 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-09-22 2:04 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 5/8] ublk_drv: consider recovery feature in aborting mechanism ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22 0:18 ` Ming Lei
2022-09-22 2:06 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 6/8] ublk_drv: support UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22 2:13 ` Ming Lei
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 7/8] ublk_drv: allow new process to open ublk chardev with recovery feature enabled ZiyangZhang
2022-09-22 2:38 ` Ming Lei
2022-09-22 3:00 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-21 9:58 ` [PATCH V4 8/8] Documentation: document ublk user recovery feature ZiyangZhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyuqV1sauPRUjug8@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox