public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390_domain aperture shrinking
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:24:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzXGpQkSG4cw3ahm@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929153302.3195115-4-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 05:33:00PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The s390 IOMMU driver currently sets the IOMMU domain's aperture to
> match the device specific DMA address range of the device that is first
> attached. This is not ideal. For one if the domain has no device
> attached in the meantime the aperture could be shrunk allowing
> translations outside the aperture to exist in the translation tables.
> Also this is a bit of a misuse of the aperture which really should
> describe what addresses can be translated and not some device specific
> limitations.
> 
> Instead of misusing the aperture like this we can instead create
> reserved ranges for the ranges inaccessible to the attached devices
> allowing devices with overlapping ranges to still share an IOMMU domain.
> This also significantly simplifies s390_iommu_attach_device() allowing
> us to move the aperture check to the beginning of the function and
> removing the need to hold the device list's lock to check the aperture.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-29 15:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommu/s390: Fixes related to attach and aperture handling Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 15:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 16:10   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-29 15:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 16:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-29 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390_domain aperture shrinking Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 16:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-09-29 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu/s390: Fix incorrect aperture check Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 15:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-30  8:01     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iommu/s390: Fix incorrect pgsize_bitmap Niklas Schnelle
2022-09-29 15:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzXGpQkSG4cw3ahm@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox