Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Add selftests for new task kfuncs

David Vernet
2022-10-03T15:36:27Z

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 02:32:41AM +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 16:47, David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
> >
> > A previous change added a series of kfuncs for storing struct
> > task_struct objects as referenced kptrs. This patch adds a new
> > task_kfunc test suite for validating their expected behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 +
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c | 155 ++++++++++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h | 83 +++++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c | 113 +++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 577 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> > index 17e074eb42b8..4c34818ec1ee 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
> > @@ -75,3 +75,4 @@ user_ringbuf # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of
> > lookup_key # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> > verify_pkcs7_sig # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> > kfunc_dynptr_param # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
> > +task_kfunc # JIT does not support calling kernel function
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6c577fbca8f7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> > +
> > +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> > +#include <sys/wait.h>
> > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +
> > +#include "task_kfunc_failure.skel.h"
> > +#include "task_kfunc_success.skel.h"
> > +
> > +static size_t log_buf_sz = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB */
> > +static char obj_log_buf[1048576];
> > +
> > +static struct task_kfunc_success *open_load_task_kfunc_skel(void)
> > +{
> > + struct task_kfunc_success *skel;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + skel = task_kfunc_success__open();
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + skel->bss->pid = getpid();
> > +
> > + err = task_kfunc_success__load(skel);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + return skel;
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > + task_kfunc_success__destroy(skel);
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void run_success_test(const char *prog_name)
> > +{
> > + struct task_kfunc_success *skel;
> > + int status;
> > + pid_t child_pid;
> > + struct bpf_program *prog;
> > + struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
> > +
> > + skel = open_load_task_kfunc_skel();
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_load_skel"))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->err, "pre_spawn_err"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attached_link"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + child_pid = fork();
> > + if (!ASSERT_GT(child_pid, -1, "child_pid"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + if (child_pid == 0)
> > + _exit(0);
> > + waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0);
> > +
> > + ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->err, "post_wait_err");
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> > + task_kfunc_success__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char * const success_tests[] = {
> > + "test_task_acquire_release",
> > + "test_task_acquire_leave_in_map",
> > + "test_task_xchg_release",
> > + "test_task_get_release",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct {
> > + const char *prog_name;
> > + const char *expected_err_msg;
> > +} failure_tests[] = {
> > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_get_null", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_get_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_release_untrusted", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_release_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
> > + {"task_kfunc_release_unacquired", "R1 must be referenced"},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg)
> > +{
> > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
> > + struct task_kfunc_failure *skel;
> > + int err, i;
> > +
> > + opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf;
> > + opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz;
> > + opts.kernel_log_level = 1;
> > +
> > + skel = task_kfunc_failure__open_opts(&opts);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "task_kfunc_failure__open_opts"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + skel->bss->pid = getpid();
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) {
> > + struct bpf_program *prog;
> > + const char *curr_name = failure_tests[i].prog_name;
> > +
> > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, curr_name);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, !strcmp(curr_name, prog_name));
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = task_kfunc_failure__load(skel);
> > + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg);
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf);
> > + }
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > + task_kfunc_failure__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_task_kfunc(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(success_tests); i++) {
> > + if (!test__start_subtest(success_tests[i]))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + run_success_test(success_tests[i]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) {
> > + if (!test__start_subtest(failure_tests[i].prog_name))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + verify_fail(failure_tests[i].prog_name, failure_tests[i].expected_err_msg);
> > + }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..bbb0a40572fd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H
> > +#define _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H
> > +
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > +#include <vmlinux.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +
> > +struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value {
> > + struct task_struct __kptr_ref * task;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct hash_map {
> > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> > + __type(key, int);
> > + __type(value, struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value);
> > + __uint(max_entries, 1);
> > +} __tasks_kfunc_map SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
> > +struct task_struct *bpf_task_kptr_get(struct task_struct **pp) __ksym;
> > +void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
> > +
> > +#define TEST_NAME_SZ 128
> > +
> > +/* The pid of the test process used to determine if a newly created task is the test task. */
> > +int pid;
> > +
> > +static inline struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *tasks_kfunc_map_value_lookup(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + s32 pid;
> > + long status;
> > +
> > + status = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&pid, sizeof(pid), &p->pid);
> > + if (status)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return bpf_map_lookup_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int tasks_kfunc_map_insert(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value local, *v;
> > + long status;
> > + struct task_struct *acquired, *old;
> > + s32 pid;
> > +
> > + status = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&pid, sizeof(pid), &p->pid);
> > + if (status)
> > + return status;
> > +
> > + local.task = NULL;
> > + status = bpf_map_update_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid, &local, BPF_NOEXIST);
> > + if (status)
> > + return status;
> > +
> > + v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid);
> > + if (!v) {
> > + bpf_map_delete_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid);
> > + return status;
> > + }
> > +
> > + acquired = bpf_task_acquire(p);
> > + old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->task, acquired);
> > + if (old) {
> > + bpf_task_release(old);
> > + return -EEXIST;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool is_test_kfunc_task(struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > + int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
> > +
> > + return pid == cur_pid;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4cf01bbc8a16
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> > +
> > +#include <vmlinux.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +
> > +#include "task_kfunc_common.h"
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > +
> > +/* Prototype for all of the program trace events below:
> > + *
> > + * TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
> > + * TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, u64 clone_flags)
> > + */
> > +
> > +SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> > +int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
> > +{
> > + struct task_struct *acquired, *stack_ptr;
> > +
> > + if (!is_test_kfunc_task(task))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Can't invoke bpf_task_acquire() on an untrusted, random pointer. */
> > + stack_ptr = (struct task_struct *)0xcafef00d;
>
> This seems like a misleading comment. 'stack_ptr' would just be a
> scalar, not a pointer. Maybe you should be testing this for an actual
> PTR_UNTRUSTED pointer instead. Load of a __kptr tagged pointer would
> be a good way.
>
> Very soon a lot of other pointers obtained from pointer walking are
> going to be marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, so then we would cover those as well
> similar to this test.

Good point and good suggestion, let me update the test to do this.

> Also, could you include a test to make sure sleepable programs cannot
> call bpf_task_acquire? It seems to assume RCU read lock is held while
> that may not be true. If already not possible, maybe a WARN_ON_ONCE
> inside the helper to ensure future cases don't creep in.

I don't _think_ it's unsafe for a sleepable program to call
bpf_task_acquire(). My understanding is that the struct task_struct *
parameter to bpf_task_acquire() is not PTR_UNTRUSTED, so it's safe to
dereference directly in the kfunc. The implicit assumption here is that
the task was either passed to the BPF program (which is calling
bpf_task_acquire()) from the main kernel in something like a trace or
struct_ops callback, or it was a referenced kptr that was removed from a
map with bpf_kptr_xchg(), and is now owned by the BPF program. Given
that the ptr type is not PTR_UNTRUSTED, it seemed correct to assume that
the task was valid in bpf_task_acquire() regardless of whether we were
in an RCU read region or not, but please let me know if I'm wrong about
that. Other kfuncs I saw such as bpf_xdp_ct_lookup() assumed that the
parameter passed by the BPF program (which itself was passing on a
pointer given to it by the main kernel) is valid as well.

Note that the difference between bpf_task_acquire() and
bpf_task_kptr_get() is that for bpf_task_kptr_get(), we're passing a
pointer to a kptr which could be swapped out and invalidated at any
moment by a bpf_kptr_xchg() elsewhere in the program. That's why it's
necessary to enter an RCU read region before calling READ_ONCE(), and
why we have to do a refcount_inc_not_zero() rather than just a
refcount_inc() as we do in bpf_task_acquire().

Thanks,
David