Re: [PATCH] lib/sort.c: Add _nonatomic() variants with cond_resched()

[Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:26:06AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Andrew - if you're ok with this patch I'd like to get it in soon as a
> bugfix, I've been getting quite a few reports on this one.
> 
> I don't much care for the naming though, thoughts there?
> 
> -- >8 --
> 
> bcachefs calls sort() during recovery to sort all keys it found in the
> journal, and this may be very large - gigabytes on large machines.
> 
> This has been causing "task blocked" warnings, so needs a
> cond_resched().
> 
> Cc: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/sort.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  lib/sort.c           | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

I don't have strong opinions on this, but I recall that UBIFS had a
similar issue with list_sort(), and they addressed it by calling
cond_resched() within the compare function. Would that approach be
simpler and more appropriate than introducing a new API in the library
code?

Regards,
Kuan-Wei