From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:56:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z+RN+CPnWO69aJD5@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z+Q/SNmX+DpVQ5ir@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:54:16AM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> > ublk_abort_requests() should be called only in case of queue dying,
> > since ublk server may open & close the char device multiple times.
>
> Sure that is technically possible, however is any real ublk server doing
> this? Seems like a strange thing to do, and seems reasonable for the
> driver to transition the device to the nosrv state (dead or recovery,
> depending on flags) when the char device is closed, since in this case,
> no one can be handling I/O anymore.
I see ublksrv itself is doing this :(
/* Wait until ublk device is setup by udev */
static void ublksrv_check_dev(const struct ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info *info)
{
unsigned int max_time = 1000000, wait = 0;
char buf[64];
snprintf(buf, 64, "%s%d", "/dev/ublkc", info->dev_id);
while (wait < max_time) {
int fd = open(buf, O_RDWR);
if (fd > 0) {
close(fd);
break;
}
usleep(100000);
wait += 100000;
}
}
This seems related to some failures in ublksrv tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 22:19 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:26 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:07 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: ignore SIGCHLD Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:23 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-26 17:17 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 5:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-26 17:54 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 18:56 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2025-03-26 23:08 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-27 1:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-27 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-31 23:17 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-02 3:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-02 19:41 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-27 2:06 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z+RN+CPnWO69aJD5@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox