From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, james.clark@linaro.org,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, vmolnaro@redhat.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Allow tolerance for leader sampling test
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 22:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-4b-sVycH2LM8y6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401172302.1442092-1-ctshao@google.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:22:39AM -0700, Chun-Tse Shao wrote:
> There is a known issue that the leader sampling is inconsistent, since
> throttle only affect leader, not the slave. The detail is in [1]. To
> maintain test coverage, this patch sets a tolerance rate of 80% to
> accommodate the throttled samples and prevent test failures due to
> throttling.
>
> [1] lore.kernel.org/20250328182752.769662-1-ctshao@google.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> index ba8d873d3ca7..1bbe16fb3420 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> @@ -238,22 +238,35 @@ test_leader_sampling() {
> err=1
> return
> fi
> + perf script -i "${perfdata}" | grep brstack > $script_output
> + # Check if the two instruction counts are equal in each record.
> + # However, the throttling code doesn't consider event grouping. During throttling, only the
> + # leader is stopped, causing the slave's counts significantly higher. To temporarily solve this,
> + # let's set the tolerance rate to 80%.
> + # TODO: Revert the code for tolerance once the throttling mechanism is fixed.
> index=0
> - perf script -i "${perfdata}" > $script_output
> + valid_counts=0
> + invalid_counts=0
> + tolerance_rate=0.8
> while IFS= read -r line
> do
> - # Check if the two instruction counts are equal in each record
> cycles=$(echo $line | awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++) if($i=="cycles:") print $(i-1)}')
> if [ $(($index%2)) -ne 0 ] && [ ${cycles}x != ${prev_cycles}x ]
> then
> - echo "Leader sampling [Failed inconsistent cycles count]"
> - err=1
> - return
> + invalid_counts=$(($invalid_counts+1))
> + else
> + valid_counts=$(($valid_counts+1))
> fi
> index=$(($index+1))
> prev_cycles=$cycles
> done < $script_output
> - echo "Basic leader sampling test [Success]"
> + if [[ "$(echo "scale=2; $invalid_counts/($invalid_counts+$valid_counts)" | bc)" > 1-$tolerance_rate ]]
Shouldn't it be double parenthesis to use numeric comparisons?
Also I'm not sure if bash supports floating-point arithmetic.
It'd be better to compare the value in bc and use its return value.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + then
> + echo "Leader sampling [Failed inconsistent cycles count]"
> + err=1
> + else
> + echo "Basic leader sampling test [Success]"
> + fi
> }
>
> test_topdown_leader_sampling() {
> --
> 2.49.0.472.ge94155a9ec-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 17:22 [PATCH v1] perf test: Allow tolerance for leader sampling test Chun-Tse Shao
2025-04-01 19:51 ` Ian Rogers
2025-04-03 5:26 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-4b-sVycH2LM8y6@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox