From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Malaya Kumar Rout <malayarout91@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/x86/lam: fix memory leak and resource leak in lam.c
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-J3jlYcocf_w4M_@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324125108.GH14944@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 06:17:50PM +0530, Malaya Kumar Rout wrote:
> > Static Analyis for bench_htab_mem.c with cppcheck:error
> > tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c:585:3:
> > error: Resource leak: file_fd [resourceLeak]
> > tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c:593:3:
> > error: Resource leak: file_fd [resourceLeak]
> > tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c:600:3:
> > error: Memory leak: fi [memleak]
> > tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c:1066:2:
> > error: Resource leak: fd [resourceLeak]
> >
> > fix the issue by closing the file descriptors and
> > releasing the allocated memory.
> >
>
> But but but, doesn't the program just exit on any of those 'errors'
> anyway?
>
> That is, iirc this is a single shot program.
While that's true, still proper cleanup of resources is a good practice
- and in more complicated tools it's useful to fix even these
semi-false-positives, to make sure other warnings don't get missed.
Having said that, the error/cleanup control flow here doesn't look
overly clean here to begin with, so I'd suggest fixing that (with goto
labels or such) - which would fix the file_fd 'leak' as a happy side
effect.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 12:47 [PATCH] selftests/x86/lam: fix memory leak and resource leak in lam.c Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-03-24 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-03-25 9:56 ` malaya kumar rout
2025-03-25 13:25 ` Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-04-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/x86/lam: fix resource leak in do_uring() and allocate_dsa_pasid() Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-04-07 18:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-07 19:34 ` [PATCH v3] " Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-04-08 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-08 18:52 ` RE:[PATCH RESEND x86-next v4] " Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-04-08 20:12 ` [PATCH " Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 13:53 ` [PATCH " Malaya Kumar Rout
2025-04-09 19:41 ` [tip: x86/mm] selftests/x86/lam: Fix clean up fds " tip-bot2 for Malaya Kumar Rout
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-J3jlYcocf_w4M_@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malayarout91@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox