Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] vsprintf: Add __printf attribute to where it's required

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Fri 2025-03-21 16:40:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This whole series started from a simple fix (see the last patch)
> to make GCC (Debian 14.2.0-17) happy when compiling with `make W=1`
> (note, that CONFIG_WERROR=y and all warnings break the build!)
> down to a rabbit hole.
> 
> However starting from v2 the last patch doesn't require the first
> part, I prefer still to have them since the functions, while being
> _binary_ printf()-like, are still printf()-like. It also puts in align
> the tracing stuff with the rest and fixes the wrong parameter value.
> 
> These first 4 patches are organised in a strict order and can't be
> reshuffled, otherwise it will produce a warnings in between.
> 
> I believe the best route for the series is printk tree with immutable
> tag or branch for the others.
> 
> Alternatively the first 4 patches can be applied first as they
> are pretty much straightforward. They also can be squashed to one
> (as the same topic behind), but it all is up to the respective
> maintainers.

The whole series looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

I am going to push it via the printk tree. I think about doing
so as a second pull request by the end of this merge window.

Anyway, I am going to wait few more days for eventual feedback
or push back.

Best Regards,
Petr