linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	brauner@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
	jlayton@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	swapnil.sapkal@amd.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 21:36:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-KjMEokv_Hs6qGh@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325121526.GA7904@redhat.com>

Thanks for the Cc

Just replying quickly without looking at anything

Oleg Nesterov wrote on Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 01:15:26PM +0100:
> All I can say right now is that the "sigpending" logic in p9_client_rpc()
> looks wrong. If nothing else:
> 
> 	- clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) is not enough, it won't make
> 	  signal_pending() false if TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set.
> 
> 	- otoh, if signal_pending() was true because of pending SIGKILL,
> 	  then after clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) wait_event_killable()
> 	  will act as uninterruptible wait_event().

Yeah, this is effectively an unkillable event loop once a flush has been
sent; this is a known issue.
I've tried to address this with async rpc (so we could send the flush
and forget about it), but that caused other regressions and I never had
time to dig into these...

The patches date back 2018 and probably won't even apply cleanly
anymore, but if anyone cares they are here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1544532108-21689-3-git-send-email-asmadeus@codewreck.org/T/#u

(the hard work of refcounting was done just before that in order to kill
this pattern, I just pretty much ran out of free time at that point,
hobbies are hard...)

So: sorry, it's probably possible to improve this, but it won't be easy
nor immediate.

> > c->trans_mod->request() calls p9_fd_request() in net/9p/trans_fd.c
> > which basically does a p9_fd_poll().
> >
> > Previously, the above would fail with err as -EIO which would
> > cause the client to "Disconnect" and the retry logic would make
> > progress. Now however, the err returned is -ERESTARTSYS which
> > will not cause a disconnect and the retry logic will hang
> > somewhere in p9_client_rpc() later.

Now, if you got this far I think it'll be easier to make whatever
changed error out with EIO again instead; I'll try to check the rest of
the thread later this week as I didn't follow this thread at all.

Thanks,
-- 
Dominique

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-22 15:54 [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter syzbot
2025-03-23 18:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:17   ` syzbot
2025-03-23 19:47     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:50       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-23 19:52       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 21:02         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 10:47           ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 11:15             ` syzbot
2025-03-24 13:17             ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 13:19               ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 14:52                 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:03                   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 16:25                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:36                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25  2:52                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 12:15                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 12:36                       ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2025-03-25 13:04                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 14:49                         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 14:58                           ` Dominique Martinet
2025-03-26 12:19                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 12:44                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 13:05                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-27 17:46                             ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-27 21:19                               ` syzbot
2025-03-27 22:18                                 ` asmadeus
2025-03-28  4:01                                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28  4:43                                     ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:06                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:07                                       ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:25                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:49                                           ` syzbot
2025-03-28 14:49                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 15:22                                               ` syzbot
2025-03-28 17:00                                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 17:56                                                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 18:20                                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29  0:00                                                   ` asmadeus
2025-03-29 14:21                                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 23:27                                                       ` asmadeus
2025-03-30 10:21                                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:03     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 20:43       ` syzbot
2025-03-24 12:49 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-03-24 13:37   ` syzbot
2025-03-28 18:14 ` David Howells
2025-03-28 18:44   ` syzbot
2025-03-28 19:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-08-03 12:09 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250323002028.3563-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23  1:15 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250323021219.3580-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23  2:48 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250324111613.3620-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-24 11:34 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-KjMEokv_Hs6qGh@codewreck.org \
    --to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).