From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D404154BFE for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 03:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742958465; cv=none; b=mIMZvsGdd6LusvvrEuyIN9egKhv0Nq++qGpUu8p8hrnS2cgjok3T2J25b39GaxingqV3pdJp97stRHyNUBH4skQxsUoKf14EQP5q9zo63zh/2QDbLoI7SE94+GPTzvS2JQPnorWXhzp/y6+T8R3yysStI8Jp9+WcimPQxP6DGiA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742958465; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yN/Lkx1N0OJq5Y+e3NqV/4uO+thy5fSIVb8mX/V8l5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XC+LxSR9cjlGe62vshqZs9N9DP4ESQA4IrolGMuTXboz7Dadfy/fBMf69dCLpBpeAE1PYVvMFoL8RlXLmdf57SAFmrtEKeblH8FypJ1lwcBhwptfJ8f2P6ChyHo69H8dCCd6a0P1QeFNYETyJY3t3a8LhYVTm6xFtJBtlM20GN0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=KrwXLIP9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="KrwXLIP9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1742958462; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5cBqfDizozM+WCO0bJhlFa+MM3ZqxFCbpm0gEORpsS4=; b=KrwXLIP901XD4nduOb5Lm0gfM5nmrX8Uf8XI8hXgPM5Z7t6IKvP8EIQPUS8Xn2mzSe6Yj8 ny8AEdNXLQ5fNQV6WHsc6CXd07+/y/0kqhdhbmv/CXDTHgp10u6CL0LTOdS+/2EtXv0zRx KtklPb5mWQkydBnjQmVFGnIj/0EjCcs= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-656-oGx5zoQ7Peeu2GShCexApg-1; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 23:07:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oGx5zoQ7Peeu2GShCexApg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: oGx5zoQ7Peeu2GShCexApg_1742958456 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F049C1800257; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 03:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.120.18]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDC6180B493; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 03:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:07:24 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Uday Shankar Cc: Shuah Khan , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes Message-ID: References: <20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-0-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com> <20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-1-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250325-ublk_timeout-v1-1-262f0121a7bd@purestorage.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 04:19:31PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote: > There are a couple of places in the kublk selftests ublk server which > use the legacy ublk opcodes. These operations fail (with -EOPNOTSUPP) on > a kernel compiled without CONFIG_BLKDEV_UBLK_LEGACY_OPCODES set. We > could easily require it to be set as a prerequisite for these selftests, > but since new applications should not be using the legacy opcodes, use > the ioctl-encoded opcodes everywhere in kublk. > > Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar Reviewed-by: Ming Lei -- Ming