public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set()
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:27:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-WKi_aKOMgbzU1M@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z-WIh6obKP-ygcsP@slm.duckdns.org>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:19:03AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:15:09PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > > If we don't want to do locked rq tracking, we can always use
> > > schedule_deferred() when any rq is locked too. That's a bit more expensive
> > > tho.
> > 
> > Yeah, I'm a bit worried that locked rq tracking might introduce overhead to
> > all the scx callbacks, just to address this issue.
> 
> All operaitons are already wrapped with SCX_CALL_OP() and updating per-cpu
> state (kf flags). It's unlikely that another percpu variable update is going
> to be noticeable.

Ack, I'll explore the locked rq tracking way then.

Thanks,
-Andrea

      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-27 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-25 14:00 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() Andrea Righi
2025-03-27  0:24 ` Tejun Heo
2025-03-27  7:56   ` Andrea Righi
2025-03-27  9:53     ` Andrea Righi
2025-03-27 17:09       ` Tejun Heo
2025-03-27 17:15         ` Andrea Righi
2025-03-27 17:19           ` Tejun Heo
2025-03-27 17:27             ` Andrea Righi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-WKi_aKOMgbzU1M@gpd3 \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox