From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:40:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-ZEUtZJPZ4BwA5r@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327102234.50ad6e84@canb.auug.org.au>
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:22:34AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native ppc perf)
> failed like this:
>
> perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:2245:1: error: unterminated comment
> 2245 | /** Pushes the new state onto the stack. The new state becomes
> | ^
> perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:20:31: error: 'perf_bpf_filter_ensure_buffer_stack' used but never defined [-Werror]
> 20 | #define yyensure_buffer_stack perf_bpf_filter_ensure_buffer_stack
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:550:13: note: in expansion of macro 'yyensure_buffer_stack'
> 550 | static void yyensure_buffer_stack ( void );
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:606:24: error: 'yy_fatal_error' used but never defined [-Werror]
> 606 | static void yynoreturn yy_fatal_error ( const char* msg );
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:510:15: error: 'yy_buffer_stack_max' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 510 | static size_t yy_buffer_stack_max = 0; /**< capacity of stack. */
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> I don't know what caused this, but simply rebuilding worked. So maybe
> some dependency is missing in the make files?
Strange, but it seems so. I'll take a look if I missed something.
Thanks for the report and your hard work!
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-28 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 23:22 linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-28 6:40 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-14 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-09 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-09 23:31 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-10 14:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-01-10 17:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-01-10 18:59 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-10 19:22 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-10-10 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-05 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-01 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-13 2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 21:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 2:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 14:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:40 ` arnaldo.melo
2024-03-21 23:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-06 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07 0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-24 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-05-29 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30 2:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-16 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-16 23:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 23:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-17 3:23 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-21 21:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-22 18:37 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-22 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-27 20:31 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-28 1:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 19:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-28 23:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-29 12:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-03 5:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01 5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07 2:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07 3:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07 4:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-20 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 2:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21 3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 5:33 ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-05 22:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-07 8:58 ` kajoljain
2022-01-11 21:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-11 22:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-12 5:30 ` kajoljain
2022-01-12 6:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-ZEUtZJPZ4BwA5r@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).