From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D9A42054EF; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 16:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743524814; cv=none; b=C39owBg5REEB2huWrJNsYwqcCHAOSm/UVTUlWlRFmtG5aZUdyDhU7B7Gl4GTZVTUbt4R1H9Tbm3id8a0x0ezBJDS26pAyiKnsmQjvKYf16XtYAuN2AMZ+8s9epnZkZDapyKHZOANZ0AxZCOTh4li/XimUcn5PZxoQxVQsxkjpAk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743524814; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EAyuzCs+2aGA6JWNoYg1cV/7AgO8c1Rwc/lh1E8GXvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OmL4THjPoKKNaxvRHT/xWf2yLXP+M4g32xvR9t3+d7aaesWRqTPuloiD5dqTqqYZ/6r5lOcCmt9xrOvMa+NVjk5QDAJ/mkqbryEa1Tw0EiDPJid2y/hI1r4xUdfvaWVpUJ1KWqfssdb3j4ir42XVvVLfWVqOtW75l4mdV5iP72E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bY21t0uU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bY21t0uU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743524812; x=1775060812; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=EAyuzCs+2aGA6JWNoYg1cV/7AgO8c1Rwc/lh1E8GXvE=; b=bY21t0uUDJaEHR3KJlklgPEBqHLY8DoRRVYDfqKe3ByQBpT4ifw2aL54 OiSboFHZS6CrTf50zlH89tSFIH7wDq3AHoHvNCKMbzS6/L+tStbvGQ+I0 si3kTfvIA2H+gmAOHW3Dqt5tKAExFqoauheq2n/DNuHaMrRh+juFKajAU FlMKcIgY5vabIcBP8+u6q/l8gCCenkUj8xt0ZduETcQ6wighe0u3c6Wpc hdNfVkwWbcI63CQVKVPo2eC+lYotN8tZcjkpYH3SNcWXL6iZRgMQrl84+ Rd8tz2OxoPkhz00dUxBciRpTd8X6NvWBHfgt9E45ZLZHLttp6wmbRNh+5 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kdEFvyT5QTG+SPoZkwAYsw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FNIhqHJnRVmo7EOyWbub6Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11391"; a="55518118" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,293,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="55518118" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2025 09:26:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Dgz+hd4dTCWbkQrj6Lu6qQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jUmcCMq5R7adXtl8eFdEPA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,293,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="131633982" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.74]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 01 Apr 2025 09:26:48 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:26:46 +0300 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:26:46 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Denis Arefev Cc: deller@gmx.de, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@intel.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, tzimmermann@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fbdev: atyfb: Fix buffer overflow Message-ID: References: <20250401102330.7759-1-arefev@swemel.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250401102330.7759-1-arefev@swemel.ru> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 01:23:30PM +0300, Denis Arefev wrote: > > It's old, but still runs in some configurations and people > > still (although probably not on daily bases) use it. > > Also don't forget about the various old non-x86 hardware machines > > which often used ATI cards too, and those machines are still > > supported by Linux as well. > > Hi Helge. > Thanks for the reply. > > Ok. Everyone agrees that there is an error (buffer overflow > lt_lcd_regs[LCD_MISC_CNTL]). As I said, that will never happen. > Ok. Everyone agrees that this code is still needed. > > Then I propose to fix this error. :) > > Unfortunately, I can't do everything by the rules, I didn't save > the chip datasheet. (I didn't think I would ever need it again.). > > Regards Denis. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel