From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, len.brown@intel.com,
artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play_dead()
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:18:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z06Nup3JOp+V8i86@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241129182232.14987-5-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Hello Patryk,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:22:32PM +0100, Patryk Wlazlyn wrote:
A couple of minor nits in the commit log:
> The current algorithm* for looking up the mwait hint for the deepest
> cstate, in mwait_play_dead() code works by inspecting CPUID leaf 0x5 and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint() after the rename in Patch 1.
> calculates the mwait hint based on the number of reported substates.
> This approach depends on the hints associated with them to be continuous
> in the range [0, NUM_SUBSTATES-1]. This continuity is not documented and
> is not met on the recent Intel platforms.
>
> * The current algorithm is implemented in the for loop inspecting edx
> in mwait_play_dead().
>
> For example, Intel's Sierra Forest report two cstates with two substates
> each in cpuid leaf 0x5:
>
> Name* target cstate target subcstate (mwait hint)
> ===========================================================
> C1 0x00 0x00
> C1E 0x00 0x01
>
> -- 0x10 ----
>
> C6S 0x20 0x22
> C6P 0x20 0x23
>
> -- 0x30 ----
>
> /* No more (sub)states all the way down to the end. */
> ===========================================================
>
> * Names of the cstates are not included in the CPUID leaf 0x5, they are
> taken from the product specific documentation.
>
> Notice that hints 0x20 and 0x21 are skipped entirely for the target
> cstate 0x20 (C6), being a cause of the problem for the current cpuid
> leaf 0x5 algorithm.
>
> Remove the old implementation of play_dead MWAIT hint calculation based
> on the CPUID leaf 0x5 in mwait_play_dead() and delegate calling of the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint()
> mwait_play_dead_with_hint() to the idle driver.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mwait_play_dead()
This should work since both acpi-idle and intel-idle drivers now
support the .enter_dead() callbacks for FFh idle states.
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me. Feel free to add the following
tag in the next version.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 56 +++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 8a3545c2cae9..82801137486d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1272,6 +1272,10 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
> local_irq_disable();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * We need to flush the caches before going to sleep, lest we have
> + * dirty data in our caches when we come back up.
> + */
> void __noreturn mwait_play_dead(unsigned int eax_hint)
> {
> struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
> @@ -1317,52 +1321,6 @@ void __noreturn mwait_play_dead(unsigned int eax_hint)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * We need to flush the caches before going to sleep, lest we have
> - * dirty data in our caches when we come back up.
> - */
> -static inline void mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint(void)
> -{
> - unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> - unsigned int highest_cstate = 0;
> - unsigned int highest_subcstate = 0;
> - int i;
> -
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
> - boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> - return;
> - if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> - return;
> - if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
> - return;
> - if (__this_cpu_read(cpu_info.cpuid_level) < CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF)
> - return;
> -
> - eax = CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF;
> - ecx = 0;
> - native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> -
> - /*
> - * eax will be 0 if EDX enumeration is not valid.
> - * Initialized below to cstate, sub_cstate value when EDX is valid.
> - */
> - if (!(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_EXTENSIONS_SUPPORTED)) {
> - eax = 0;
> - } else {
> - edx >>= MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE;
> - for (i = 0; i < 7 && edx; i++, edx >>= MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) {
> - if (edx & MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK) {
> - highest_cstate = i;
> - highest_subcstate = edx & MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK;
> - }
> - }
> - eax = (highest_cstate << MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) |
> - (highest_subcstate - 1);
> - }
> -
> - mwait_play_dead(eax);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Kick all "offline" CPUs out of mwait on kexec(). See comment in
> * mwait_play_dead().
> @@ -1413,9 +1371,9 @@ void native_play_dead(void)
> play_dead_common();
> tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
>
> - mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint();
> - if (cpuidle_play_dead())
> - hlt_play_dead();
> + /* Below returns only on error. */
> + cpuidle_play_dead();
> + hlt_play_dead();
> }
>
> #else /* ... !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> --
> 2.47.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 18:22 [PATCH v7 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-29 18:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-12-03 4:37 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-12-10 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-17 20:09 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-12-17 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-02 9:50 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-29 18:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] ACPI: processor_idle: Add FFH state handling Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-12-03 4:39 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-12-10 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-29 18:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] intel_idle: Provide the default enter_dead() handler Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-29 18:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play_dead() Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-12-03 4:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z06Nup3JOp+V8i86@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox