From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E540B79C0; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732284460; cv=none; b=Z6OoR3EDIrA3HhjtZUDWfASP4E7Q8u6wnOfuEoFMxQz/SoL150TELaolgp7vKKK17jLwjrC0cZFJY2x5rmkyLLJF0datDSvBwJpwWjC96YC2gnsbHB879AiZQev76496QMyVCf0kS4rqxCdepImJCWCP6dABY9WSPV7y6wdTI4M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732284460; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6LxAtSZRApbfNLLb3X+tepUeBQCxISWpMEY+0sqzII4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nnsDfWZSlbqXBQCvRdxEZVNtd0pnas78tXu7k4ylI3botyXWT5rg6dFxUREP40wA3NoeUiCywD/Z7sdQN5kDjHlwBOX3AxyD9JSvKUTkLzSACOSbPRzLz5KKzzRfpIL7TaMo6lw2eBq8XCSt5xdggsGrKFuCdSlBORGLN2U5n0c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lnHUPaLY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lnHUPaLY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732284459; x=1763820459; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6LxAtSZRApbfNLLb3X+tepUeBQCxISWpMEY+0sqzII4=; b=lnHUPaLYayMvsBtRTWaqBn8AzK2oyy9d0q+H9AD6zpTGZyQHryzbH+ge 4lGko0VBEgMoH/to71nULxxUHSAYntvg9fzDB/RVraBwwGfGY0gzcqxO4 SZxV03qAbJOqbALCttp3MEicmeu2hT+cuQ7Hyk6eSe/h74aIfnUWS9Ecz trjV2iLgkXRkkSJZSMXyhYF9JVOtQ5Twum8wQBQ34v/2LzpT654/qEFvJ AjhsuEbNhJNEqT/6qqjvWqOK3wdpCCkkDABXP32Gp8Jk0AdqFF1NHpxcI 0Vwljcuk4+ymBqEc0R8+xWySVNjNo51NyceH9uoMRcOzQvN5jLV0F68ko Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: y9VsbfElSHG3bOsq+a1lSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +yc6K4UeQE2EA7xujPNzzQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11264"; a="20029913" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,175,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="20029913" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2024 06:07:38 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: b3EMS874Q5io+xtMTRFWyg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pUXn745UQnWtTc8a2YNH5Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,175,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90395444" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2024 06:07:35 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tEUJo-0000000HR0C-42ua; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:07:32 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:07:32 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Wolfram Sang , Sakari Ailus , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Cosmin Tanislav , Tomi Valkeinen , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c: atr: Fix client detach Message-ID: References: <20241122-i2c-atr-fixes-v2-0-0acd325b6916@ideasonboard.com> <20241122-i2c-atr-fixes-v2-1-0acd325b6916@ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241122-i2c-atr-fixes-v2-1-0acd325b6916@ideasonboard.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 02:26:18PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > From: Tomi Valkeinen > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen We (used to?) have a check in Linux Next against missing SoB of the committer, wouldn't this trap into it? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko