From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8765B4A01; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732284828; cv=none; b=c/YPhtFvQpuMiEjZCWFgrYUQtQS/jLrVjXbLFRxl7QGcmcNaoQ63lUxoint4/H8RIWah2eOCKbBw1oSNsYKebA+9rTGk9cx5psgVj0jmm2NJkbVGDHPeoUDMm35n9I6Kv3PmvOVyIR+SekP+NzezcS8BgpYrpXOefymESJdkvm8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732284828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tC/OWioCUX/fp6QqWFU9Xo4YC5HhhdV5m4rgzkWdOZY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MzUFCUp2sCl+eme0oMEsMzhJMjT+0Jsz1yWlG6hAWdlAv/syr5sOQxTL77WHvLz3JMliwNWlBDamHofw4nqULsvU79PbnewuIn3RrEKn8B7hKRv/g680hN1AlzP1fqUQcQDL5fWMYf4v8mdFCsW7DJO+0z5Z1RrEV1T8bn6NqX8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nfV6R0FI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nfV6R0FI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732284828; x=1763820828; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=tC/OWioCUX/fp6QqWFU9Xo4YC5HhhdV5m4rgzkWdOZY=; b=nfV6R0FIWAEbrHEP2Mrp7nfddNVkvWv5ZprMqfMjJOVB0lvj0TiFYyzi vaQFKtiR93OmyDCPnTj4GgaxDkpAZSvBJjDL33EQpugHiY2a1uBe0tx9W e28FbUqgltYJrLaWaznvJRKJ1ZelOyRr4eR119WkgJCS9ddZJ903QYPGS 1CuXCSP66c1I98gbP6R0R2KNDEGZKSYtRBYEnoEliLFt9yWB3T5WPt5uM BBLR1nT9YSaJklAK5qP7yB8KLKGzlwv8i4arcWqePpZbq9GKUhvgyy0Bg JUP1Diz/41mPzX02cMqis8djhhPoaKLNpkdVJJakZKbGbOLUhZbvf1ueo g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VuPifvZBQKmqVq7gCtNm5g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: x+gw3WqET8anDrSbQDDOPA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11264"; a="32302664" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,175,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="32302664" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2024 06:13:48 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TSzuK4itT7uwGIE5SU9gLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NbRFCr5+S1SZIMX3pTB90g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,175,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90226536" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2024 06:13:44 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tEUPl-0000000HR60-2nLE; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:13:41 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:13:41 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Wolfram Sang , Sakari Ailus , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Cosmin Tanislav , Tomi Valkeinen , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: atr: A few i2c-atr fixes Message-ID: References: <20241122-i2c-atr-fixes-v2-0-0acd325b6916@ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241122-i2c-atr-fixes-v2-0-0acd325b6916@ideasonboard.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 02:26:17PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > The last two are perhaps not strictly fixes, as they essentially add > support for nested ATRs. The first one is a fix, thus stable is in cc. Other than SoB chain issues, code wise LGTM, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko