From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Li Ming <ming4.li@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
rrichter@amd.com, terry.bowman@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Mem Hole
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:46:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0Dfl76DIsrmWEZ1@PC2K9PVX.TheFacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241122155226.2068287-1-fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 04:51:51PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure (CFMWS) describes zero or more Host
> Physical Address (HPA) windows that are associated with each CXL Host
> Bridge. Each window represents a contiguous HPA that may be interleaved
> with one or more targets (CXL v3.1 - 9.18.1.3).
>
> The Low Memory Hole (LMH) of x86 is a range of addresses of physical low
> memory to which systems cannot send transactions. On those systems, BIOS
> publishes CFMWS which communicate the active System Physical Address (SPA)
> ranges that map to a subset of the Host Physical Address (HPA) ranges. The
> SPA range trims out the hole, and capacity in the endpoint is lost with no
> SPA to map to CXL HPA in that hole.
>
> In the early stages of CXL Regions construction and attach on platforms
> with Low Memory Holes, the driver fails and returns an error because it
> expects that the CXL Endpoint Decoder range is a subset of the Root
> Decoder's.
>
> Then detect SPA/HPA misalignment and allow CXL Regions construction and
> attach if and only if the misalignment is due to x86 Low Memory Holes.
+cc Robert Richter and Terry Bowman
This is not the only memory-hole possibility. We may need something
more robust, rather than optimizing for a single memory hole solution.
Robert and Terry may have some additional context here.
~Gregory
>
> - Patch 1/3 changes the calling conventions of three match_*_by_range()
> helpers in preparation of 2/3.
> - Patch 2/3 detects x86 LMH and enables CXL Regions construction and
> attach by trimming HPA by SPA.
> - Patch 3/3 simulates a LMH for running the CXL tests on patched driver.
>
> Many thanks to Alison, Dan, and Ira for their help and for their reviews
> of my RFC on Intel's internal ML.
>
> Fabio M. De Francesco (3):
> cxl/core: Change match_*_by_range() calling convention
> cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Memory Hole
> cxl/test: Simulate an x86 Low Memory Hole for tests
>
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 5 +++
> drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 32 +++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/cxl/Kbuild | 1 +
> tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c | 4 +-
> 7 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c
>
> --
> 2.46.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-22 15:51 [PATCH 0/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Mem Hole Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-22 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] cxl/core: Change match_*_by_range() calling convention Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-22 17:28 ` Ira Weiny
2024-11-25 21:10 ` Alison Schofield
2024-11-22 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Memory Hole Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-22 17:25 ` Ira Weiny
2024-11-25 11:23 ` Li Ming
2024-11-25 8:41 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-25 8:42 ` Li Ming
2024-11-25 17:22 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-26 2:13 ` Li Ming
2024-11-25 13:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-25 20:35 ` Alison Schofield
2024-11-25 22:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-16 21:30 ` Robert Richter
2025-01-08 14:48 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2025-01-09 10:58 ` Robert Richter
2025-01-10 16:06 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-22 15:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] cxl/test: Simulate an x86 Low Memory Hole for tests Fabio M. De Francesco
2024-11-22 17:26 ` Ira Weiny
2024-11-25 20:46 ` Alison Schofield
2024-11-26 15:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-11-22 19:46 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2024-11-25 22:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low Mem Hole Alison Schofield
2024-12-03 18:23 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0Dfl76DIsrmWEZ1@PC2K9PVX.TheFacebook.com \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox