From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2207F376E0; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732535411; cv=none; b=GrIkAOfqecBeUGvdb6iUGzWFfoUaEsX1yEW25fLzjrET44IoFGri2hWXQ7BkZRePZwsSke8M9jj31+1+cqDKIHgnRBJuHOl4u+Xfku20TNyuTWLnXGUuXkNnyBE7Fr8OUEMSgct38ekmuyjFJZ3BFj89rws4+Ax+YQRaOQG1uTM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732535411; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kSYSImDUvkzfXkaqiB+cnw9SCsDTqsyLlK3fME3dMxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JlZJJF8/gNZiUtU5IraM2Pwl1t5vW+NgohoKB2+tK7SDj7+KLcatjW6zq/E46T3ffxAJrzoyZlsfe2rG0LpWOP8CIcR5bwn1SWBTBEgyQE3+fln0/aSe4/XrfbbV2txnlYtew3s3rcYc6YgXKZ7uzRCVKTn925Oxih5jRRv7yFk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bM8LmYuf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bM8LmYuf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732535409; x=1764071409; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kSYSImDUvkzfXkaqiB+cnw9SCsDTqsyLlK3fME3dMxw=; b=bM8LmYufjsZTbsS1tysY/ttm6jBLJrVZxPu8tiAq/Mh4i1cZtH8k2eaU 4rDqcQs/G2pTCtFMdB1n89mBwBseiBUO4rsIGKjmwYbaoORNgXCg7UZv9 bjeRGmJd+8S1yjNacS8Nb0coSgkUee0UDPdFh6LmSvAH49Go088E7j/jY qb6EDoLS7r9o7L0eox9JIv0Ohh7b3wcUVqNptHxD+Jkh90SNzgLyyfoxK jCIaIMXA4HUS8ieO6sHxIJQH0nRd8Ejul25bJFlSAYw8XCyndKnt2Yjc5 SjFeTLLHBD5wk0MMIDlrEnwfUvpo1BNUfFJvbx35ahhpEf6Uv9IOPWW8A A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rhQKMbmWTxa8Ql/x9J9oJA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zOGUX84DTyyJpsRs0TBc1g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11266"; a="44017392" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,182,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="44017392" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2024 03:50:08 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mhL5UBfPSYuWDQnQLKUlgw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6j3M5iBBQp6hsk0gnibVaQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,182,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="91589894" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2024 03:50:05 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tFXbO-00000000joT-27qB; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:50:02 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:50:02 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Alexandre Mergnat Cc: Mark Brown , Nicolas Belin , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoc: mediatek: mt8365: Don't use "proxy" headers Message-ID: References: <20241031102725.2447711-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 12:32:13PM +0100, Alexandre Mergnat wrote: > Hello Andy. > > Actually, after test it, "linux/of_gpio.h" isn't needed at all anymore. > > That mean all added include in this patch aren't required. Do you mean the driver doesn't not use types from types.h or dev_*() macros from dev_printk.h? I don't believe this, sorry. Basically what you are trying to say is "let's move of_gpio.h implicit includes to become something else's problem". It's not what this patch intended to do. > On 04/11/2024 22:12, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 09:06:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:27:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Update header inclusions to follow IWYU (Include What You Use) > > > > principle. > > > > > Hmm... I think we are waiting for somebody to Ack / review this change? > > > > Yes. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko