From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
len.brown@intel.com, artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] acpi_idle: Add FFH cstate handling
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:44:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0SUU+dEeF5NqNBM@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125132029.7241-8-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Hello Patryk,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 02:20:27PM +0100, Patryk Wlazlyn wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
The patch looks good to me. But this needs a more detailed changelog.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 ++
> include/acpi/processor.h | 5 +++++
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index ea33439a5d00..1da5e08de257 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_PVUNLOCK ( 8*32+20) /* PV unlock function */
> #define X86_FEATURE_VCPUPREEMPT ( 8*32+21) /* PV vcpu_is_preempted function */
> #define X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST ( 8*32+22) /* "tdx_guest" Intel Trust Domain Extensions Guest */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_NO_MWAIT_OFFLINE ( 8*32+23) /* Don't use MWAIT states for offlined CPUs */
>
> /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (EBX), word 9 */
> #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE ( 9*32+ 0) /* "fsgsbase" RDFSBASE, WRFSBASE, RDGSBASE, WRGSBASE instructions*/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> index f3ffd0a3a012..c80a3e6dba5f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,15 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int cpu,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe);
>
> +void acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct cstate_entry *percpu_entry;
> +
> + percpu_entry = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_cstate_entry, cpu);
> + mwait_play_dead_with_hint(percpu_entry->states[cx->index].eax);
> +}
> +
> void __cpuidle acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 698897b29de2..586cc7d1d8aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,8 @@ static void acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
> raw_safe_halt();
> else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) {
> io_idle(cx->address);
> + } else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
> + acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead(cx);
> } else
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index a17e97e634a6..63a37e72b721 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int cpu,
> struct acpi_processor_cx *cx,
> struct acpi_power_register *reg);
> void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx *cstate);
> +void acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx);
> #else
> static inline void acpi_processor_power_init_bm_check(struct
> acpi_processor_flags
> @@ -300,6 +301,10 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx
> {
> return;
> }
> +static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx)
> +{
> + return;
> +}
> #endif
>
> static inline int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg,
> --
> 2.47.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 13:20 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] cpuidle: Do not return from cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:36 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] cpuidle: Change :enter_dead() driver callback return type to void Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] ACPI: processor_idle: Use acpi_idle_play_dead() for all C-states Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:39 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 14:36 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with arbitrary hint Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 14:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-26 11:36 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-26 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play_dead() Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-25 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:43 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-26 11:56 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-26 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-26 13:10 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-26 13:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] intel_idle: Provide enter_dead() handler for SRF Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:48 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 14:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-25 13:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-25 14:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] acpi_idle: Add FFH cstate handling Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 14:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 15:14 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2024-11-26 12:03 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] acpi_idle: Disallow play_dead with FFH cstate on AMD platforms Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 13:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-25 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-25 14:56 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2024-11-25 15:17 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-25 15:15 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-26 12:05 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0SUU+dEeF5NqNBM@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox