From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bp@alien8.de, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
dave.jiang@intel.com, irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com,
david.e.box@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:24:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0U/VC2uyC1zcBjZ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120195329.25931E2D@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:53:30AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:53:30 -0800
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition
>
>
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>
> The leaf-to-feature dependency array uses hard-coded leaf numbers.
> Use the new common header definition for the MWAIT leaf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~mwait-leaf-checks-1 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~mwait-leaf-checks-1 2024-11-20 11:44:16.169610481 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c 2024-11-20 11:44:16.169610481 -0800
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 19:53 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/cpu: Move MWAIT leaf definition to common header Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:24 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/cpu: Remove unnecessary MwAIT leaf checks Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/acpi: Check MWAIT feature instead of CPUID level Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-21 21:46 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/cpu: Refresh DCA leaf reading code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:11 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-26 3:55 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/cpu: Move TSC CPUID leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:23 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/tsc: Move away from TSC leaf magic numbers Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/tsc: Remove CPUID "frequency" " Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:37 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/fpu: Move CPUID leaf definitions to common code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:43 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/fpu: Remove unnecessary CPUID level check Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-22 17:46 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/cpu: Make all all CPUID leaf names consistent Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 20:23 ` Dave Jiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-30 21:33 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-10-30 21:33 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0U/VC2uyC1zcBjZ@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox